| Author |
I want a small simple phone
|
|
| 321design 2007-02-23, 4:33 am |
| Why doesn't some body make a small cell phone that will fit in my
pocket and not make people ask "is that a cell phone in my pocket or
am I happy to see me?" I don't care about a camera, or MP3 player, I
just want a small phone. And I don't like wearing one on my belt
either. While you are at it, improve the sound quality.
Anybody know who has the smallest cell phone available to Verizon
customers?
Thanks,
Rob H.
| |
| Wolfgang Barth 2007-02-24, 4:33 am |
| 321design wrote:
> Why doesn't some body make a small cell phone that will fit in my
> pocket and not make people ask "is that a cell phone in my pocket or
> am I happy to see me?" I don't care about a camera, or MP3 player, I
> just want a small phone. And I don't like wearing one on my belt
> either. While you are at it, improve the sound quality.
There are hundreds of GSM phones on the market.
You need a THIN one. Thin ones do not tend to be the cheapest. But I
like my original first series Motorola Razr V3. It is very thin.
Ebay sells it for 130$ or so UNLOCKED usable for all networks!
Or the Motorola L2 silver. Very thin. Unlocked for just 90$.
Both are quadband and usable in ALL GSM networks.
>
> Anybody know who has the smallest cell phone available to Verizon
> customers?
It does not matter, that you are a Verizon customer. Just put your
Verizon SIM card into the unlocked GSM phone and thats it.
Wolfgang
| |
|
|
| 321design 2007-02-24, 12:33 pm |
| On Feb 24, 5:13 am, Wolfgang Barth <bart...@spamfence.net> wrote:
> 321design wrote:
>
> There are hundreds of GSM phones on the market.
>
> You need a THIN one. Thin ones do not tend to be the cheapest. But I
> like my original first series Motorola Razr V3. It is very thin.
> Ebay sells it for 130$ or so UNLOCKED usable for all networks!
>
> Or the Motorola L2 silver. Very thin. Unlocked for just 90$.
>
> Both are quadband and usable in ALL GSM networks.
>
>
> It does not matter, that you are a Verizon customer. Just put your
> Verizon SIM card into the unlocked GSM phone and thats it.
>
> Wolfgang
Thanks Wolfgang for the response.
I've heard that the Razor has poor sound quality. What isthe
difference between the V3 and the L2? Is it worth the extra $40?
Are there anyother phones out there that are small and are quadband
that you can suggest? I've also heard (no pun intended) that Motorola
phones have VG sound quality.
Rob
| |
| 3Gfreak 2007-02-25, 3:33 pm |
| On Feb 24, 8:16 am, "321design" <321des...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 5:13 am, Wolfgang Barth <bart...@spamfence.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Wolfgang for the response.
> I've heard that the Razor has poor sound quality. What isthe
> difference between the V3 and the L2? Is it worth the extra $40?
> Are there anyother phones out there that are small and are quadband
> that you can suggest? I've also heard (no pun intended) that Motorola
> phones have VG sound quality.
>
> Rob
The RAZR doesn't have poor sound quality. The software on the phone is
basically the same but the L2 is a lower end phone. Opt for the L7 or
SLVR ( Same phone).
Have a good one
3GFreak
www.mobilevertigo.com
| |
|
|
| Wolfgang Barth 2007-02-27, 10:33 pm |
| 3Gfreak wrote:
>
> The RAZR doesn't have poor sound quality. The software on the phone is
> basically the same but the L2 is a lower end phone. Opt for the L7 or
> SLVR ( Same phone).
Yeah. But it costs 135 $ unlocked. Its also candybar like the L2. It's
thin but with color screen. The original poster wanted a SIMPLE phone.
If you want color then I would prefer the flip-phone V3 RAZR.
SAGEM from France is now introducing even thinner phones (5.9mm).
I'm not quite sure if you can buy them in the US.
Wolfgang
| |
|
|
|
|