|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cell Phone Tech > September 2005 > Different unlock codes for Nokia?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Different unlock codes for Nokia?
|
|
|
| Never being one to rely on a single data set, I used an unlock .exe app
(Crus) and a web java app (trycktill.com) to generate unlock codes. These
generated different numbers. Codes are the same except for 2nd digit (see
below).
Should I care? Will both unlock the phone? Which should I use? Would several
people please add their results?
Phone: Nokia 6200 (plain 6200, no suffix letter)
IMEI: 351509004155268
Country: USA
Network: AT&T
Thanks,
- - - -
Results from Crus (PC) software:
Model: Nokia (6200 )
IMEI: 351509004155268
Network: 31038000
#pw+10 61 44 73 04 73 44 3+1#
#pw+04 84 53 77 06 36 55 7+2#
#pw+71 75 60 04 75 67 76 1+3#
#pw+79 88 60 12 56 50 76 0+4#
#pw+00 75 33 53 05 77 03 1+5#
#pw+27 95 35 70 47 57 33 7+6#
#pw+90 80 72 43 26 62 67
2+7# | |
|
| These are the numbers:
- - - -
Results from Crus (PC) software:
Model: Nokia (6200 )
IMEI: 351509004155268
Network: 31038000
#pw+10 61 44 73 04 73 44 3+1#
#pw+04 84 53 77 06 36 55 7+2#
#pw+71 75 60 04 75 67 76 1+3#
#pw+79 88 60 12 56 50 76 0+4#
#pw+00 75 33 53 05 77 03 1+5#
#pw+27 95 35 70 47 57 33 7+6#
#pw+90 80 72 43 26 62 67 2+7#
- - - -
Results from trycktill.com (using Mozilla)
Phone type: DCT4
IMEI: 351509004155268
Model: 6200
#pw+116134730473443+
1#
#pw+058443770636557+
2#
#pw+727550047567761+
3#
#pw+708850125650760+
4#
#pw+017523530577031+
5#
#pw+289525704757337+
6#
#pw+918062432662672+
7#
Thanks,
--
Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't
ask a question here if I hadn't done that already.
DaveC
me@privacy.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group
--
Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't
ask a question here if I hadn't done that already.
DaveC
me@privacy.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group
| |
| Joseph 2005-08-28, 11:48 pm |
| On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 07:46:14 -0700, DaveC <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>Never being one to rely on a single data set, I used an unlock .exe app
>(Crus) and a web java app (trycktill.com) to generate unlock codes. These
>generated different numbers. Codes are the same except for 2nd digit (see
>below).
>
>Should I care? Will both unlock the phone? Which should I use? Would several
>people please add their results?
>
>Phone: Nokia 6200 (plain 6200, no suffix letter)
>IMEI: 351509004155268
>Country: USA
>Network: AT&T
>
>Thanks,
>- - - -
>Results from Crus (PC) software:
>
>Model: Nokia (6200 )
>IMEI: 351509004155268
>Network: 31038000
>
>#pw+10 61 44 73 04 73 44 3+1#
>#pw+04 84 53 77 06 36 55 7+2#
>#pw+71 75 60 04 75 67 76 1+3#
>#pw+79 88 60 12 56 50 76 0+4#
>#pw+00 75 33 53 05 77 03 1+5#
>#pw+27 95 35 70 47 57 33 7+6#
>#pw+90 80 72 43 26 62 67
>2+7# | |
| Joseph 2005-08-28, 11:48 pm |
| On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 07:51:05 -0700, DaveC <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't
>ask a question here if I hadn't done that already.
You're signature is annoying in a major way. Is that your intention?
- -
| |
| Geoff 2005-08-28, 11:48 pm |
| Joseph wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 07:51:05 -0700, DaveC <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> You're signature is annoying in a major way. Is that your intention?
> - -
>
Relax.
I find your confusion of "you're" for "your" equally irritating, but I
wouldn't have mentioned it.....
Geoff.
| |
| Brian Morrison 2005-08-29, 5:48 pm |
| DaveC wrote:
> Never being one to rely on a single data set, I used an unlock .exe app
> (Crus) and a web java app (trycktill.com) to generate unlock codes. These
> generated different numbers. Codes are the same except for 2nd digit (see
> below).
>
> Should I care? Will both unlock the phone? Which should I use? Would several
> people please add their results?
They are different because the box serial used to calculate them is not
the same I would think.
I'd be tempted to try the Trycktill codes first, using code 7, and see
if that works.
--
Brian Morrison
please observe reply-to address
| |
| Joseph 2005-08-29, 5:48 pm |
| On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:51:12 GMT, Geoff <gg@c-l.com> wrote:
>I find your confusion of "you're" for "your" equally irritating, but I
>wouldn't have mentioned it.....
Perhaps it is, but I don't repeat it in every frikkin' message I post
to the news group. Some people are professionals at being annoying I
only do it in my spare time.
- -
| |
|
| Thus spake Brian Morrison:
> I'd be tempted to try the Trycktill codes first, using code 7, and see
> if that works.
Thanks.
I tried the #7 and #1 codes (recommended order) and neither worked. Finally
got help from the guy(s) at this forum:
http://www.unlockme.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=151558
Very free, very helpful, and very fast!
--
Please, no "Go Google this" replies. I wouldn't
ask a question here if I hadn't done that already.
DaveC
me@privacy.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group
| |
|
| Some people are professionals at being annoying I
> only do it in my spare time.
I can vouch for this.
| |
| Elmo P. Shagnasty 2005-09-02, 11:48 pm |
| In article < 1gl4h1t287lvc0t9r155
hpu6fnec7877s5@4ax.com>,
Joseph <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> You're signature is annoying in a major way. Is that your intention?
I agree.
Frankly, the reason for "Google it" replies is because virtually no one
bothers to Google it; virtually everyone comes to a place like this
expecting to be hand fed.
And we're tired of hand feeding.
If he has Googled the question, he's one in a million.
| |
| Ivor Jones 2005-09-03, 11:48 pm |
|
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in
message
news:elmop-2B1F79. 19524702092005@nntp1
.usenetserver.com
> In article < 1gl4h1t287lvc0t9r155
hpu6fnec7877s5@4ax.com>,
> Joseph <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I agree.
>
> Frankly, the reason for "Google it" replies is because
> virtually no one bothers to Google it; virtually everyone
> comes to a place like this expecting to be hand fed.
Maybe I'm missing the point here, but if you're not prepared to answer
someone's question, why respond at all..?
> And we're tired of hand feeding.
Then don't..!
> If he has Googled the question, he's one in a million.
Personally, it doesn't bother me whether someone has Googled or not, if I
can answer a question I will do so. If you don't want to, don't, I for one
won't hold it against you, but complaining that people ask here without
looking on Google first isn't going to stop them, any more than replying
to trolls is going to stop *them* from infesting the system.
Ivor
| |
| Elmo P. Shagnasty 2005-09-03, 11:48 pm |
| In article < 3nu81cF390loU1@indiv
idual.net>,
"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm missing the point here, but if you're not prepared to answer
> someone's question, why respond at all..?
To tell people that the answer they're looking for has been given many,
many times before--and to get them used to Googling for it.
| |
| Ivor Jones 2005-09-03, 11:48 pm |
|
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in
message
news:elmop-F7AEDC. 17542803092005@nntp2
.usenetserver.com
> In article < 3nu81cF390loU1@indiv
idual.net>,
> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> To tell people that the answer they're looking for has
> been given many, many times before--and to get them used
> to Googling for it.
But it won't make any difference, they will *still* ask here, so you're
wasting your time. If you don't want to answer their questions then don't,
but keeping on at them to use Google is pointless.
Like I said, I will answer a question if I know the answer, if I don't I
keep quiet.
Ivor
| |
| Elmo P. Shagnasty 2005-09-03, 11:48 pm |
| In article < 3nul19F3bocsU1@indiv
idual.net>,
"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
> But it won't make any difference, they will *still* ask here, so you're
> wasting your time.
Some people are lazy, others simply aren't aware that they're not asking
anything new.
If I can get even a few people used to the idea that their question has
been asked and answered many times before, and to Google for the answer,
that's a good thing.
So I'll tell them to Google for it.
| |
| alan.webb@DogForAWalkblueyonder.co.uk 2005-09-04, 5:48 pm |
| On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 23:05:28 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>Like I said, I will answer a question if I know the answer, if I don't I
>keep quiet.
>
>Ivor
>
IBTD
I count 3 replies in this thread that do not answer the OP's question.
<sarcasm> very quiet indeed </sarcasm>
Alan
Take DogForAWalk before replying by e-mail
| |
| Ivor Jones 2005-09-04, 5:48 pm |
|
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in
message
news:elmop-09F6E2. 18385703092005@nntp2
.usenetserver.com
> In article < 3nul19F3bocsU1@indiv
idual.net>,
> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Some people are lazy, others simply aren't aware that
> they're not asking anything new.
>
> If I can get even a few people used to the idea that
> their question has been asked and answered many times
> before, and to Google for the answer, that's a good thing.
>
> So I'll tell them to Google for it.
Feel free, but you're still wasting your time. Me, I'd rather spend my
time productively, by answering the question if I know the answer.
Ivor
| |
| Ivor Jones 2005-09-04, 5:48 pm |
|
<alan. webb@DogForAWalkblue
yonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1bflh11gc9ks1ai
0o3d1a3ml2aifman66n@
4ax.com
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 23:05:28 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
> IBTD
> I count 3 replies in this thread that do not answer the
> OP's question. <sarcasm> very quiet indeed </sarcasm>
I wasn't replying to the IP as I didn't know the answer. I was replying to
the insistent "Google for it" reply. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
Ivor
| |
| Ivor Jones 2005-09-04, 5:48 pm |
|
"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:3o0qk4F3m62fU1@
individual.net
[snip]
> I wasn't replying to the IP as I didn't know the answer.
> I was replying to the insistent "Google for it" reply.
> Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
> Ivor
IP = OP, typing too fast <g>
Ivor
| |
| John Phillips 2005-09-04, 5:48 pm |
| On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, at 10:00:51 [GMT +0100] (19:00:51 Monday, 29 August
2005 where I live) "Brian Morrison" wrote:
> I'd be tempted to try the Trycktill codes first, using code 7, and see
> if that works.
Why did you select that one?
--
A man should live forever, or die trying.
| |
| Brian Morrison 2005-09-04, 5:48 pm |
| John Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, at 10:00:51 [GMT +0100] (19:00:51 Monday, 29 August
> 2005 where I live) "Brian Morrison" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Why did you select that one?
>
Code 7 is the release all locks code.
--
Brian Morrison
please observe reply-to address
| |
| Elmo P. Shagnasty 2005-09-04, 11:48 pm |
| In article < 3o0qhoF3ls3sU1@indiv
idual.net>,
"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
> Feel free, but you're still wasting your time. Me, I'd rather spend my
> time productively, by answering the question if I know the answer.
Over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and
over, and over, and over, and over, and over again.
THAT'S how to spend your time productively. Yes sir. You've sure told
US.
| |
| Cyrus Afzali 2005-09-13, 2:14 pm |
| On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 18:38:57 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article < 3nul19F3bocsU1@indiv
idual.net>,
> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>Some people are lazy, others simply aren't aware that they're not asking
>anything new.
>
>If I can get even a few people used to the idea that their question has
>been asked and answered many times before, and to Google for the answer,
>that's a good thing.
>
>So I'll tell them to Google for it.
I understand this philosophy and use it myself sometimes when it
involves subjects that are relatively elementary. However, one could
also argue that telling everyone to Google it will only hasten the
demise of Usenet. It's already a very niche outpost, so if everyone
Googles, there will be less use for it and fewer outlets for people
who don't publish a Web site or blog.
| |
| Kraftee 2005-09-13, 2:14 pm |
| Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in
> message
> news:elmop-09F6E2. 18385703092005@nntp2
.usenetserver.com
>
> Feel free, but you're still wasting your time. Me, I'd rather spend my
> time productively, by answering the question if I know the answer.
Sorry but I must disagree, how many times have you been on a newsgroup
to find people asking the same question as that which has been answered
in another thread the very same day.
This is a resource not a spoon feed device, users should either be
taught or be self motivated enough to learn how to use it. Next thing
you know they'll be wanting people to give up their time & resources to
visit them to deal with the problem, that's if they don't learn (or
can't be bothered)...
|
|
|
|
|