|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cellular phones topics > June 2005 > Nokia 6230 vs. Motorola V3 Razr
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Nokia 6230 vs. Motorola V3 Razr
|
|
|
| Soliciting opinions on a Nokia 6230 vs. Motorola V3 Razr
1st let me say that I own the V3 and am very happy with it. I have only
recently considered the 6230 mainly because I understand you can put a chip
in it to expand it's memory capacity. Am I correct in assuming this would
let me store many more contacts and appointments in the calendar? I would
not need the memory for many pictures although MP3's would be nice. Does
Nokia have a program similar to Motorola's Mobile Phone Tools? Of course
there is THE RECEPTION QUESTION.. Does either have superior cell reception?
Your opinions please.
The pluses & minuses as I see them:
V3 Razr
By far the better display and form factor.
Mobile Phone Tools Software
6230
Expandable memory (if it will do what I want - contacts & appointment
mostly). I would like it to do enough of each
that I could shelve my Palm Pilot a good deal of the time.
Much better searches in the contact list
More information re contacts (addresses, notes, etc.)
Thanks in advance for your input.
Fred
| |
| talksense 2005-06-14, 4:55 pm |
| You have enough information to probably make the call. Here are some of the
pluses and minuses that I see with these two phones:
Razr
Pluses
1. Cool factor, this is definitely the coolest phone around, for now.
2. Great reception, I haven't used a phone that gets better reception than
Razr
3. Very good build quality, Airline grade aluminium and magnesium plated
keypad
4. Very good: big and crisp display.
Minuses:
1. Lack of memory. It's a very basic phone with much of the bells and
whistles like : MP3 player, FM radio etc missing.
2. So so camera.
6230
1. Excellent reception, almost as good as the Razr
2. External memory
3. MP3 player/FM radio
4. Very good user interface.
Minues
1. One big one, a very shitty and tiny display. What is the use of having
video playback capability if you are going to make a tiny and crappy
display.
As a phone, both these phones work great.
http://www.mobileisgood.com
"Fred" <agunat@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:qGrqe.12856$Hj.4655@lakeread02...
quote:
> Soliciting opinions on a Nokia 6230 vs. Motorola V3 Razr
>
> 1st let me say that I own the V3 and am very happy with it. I have only
> recently considered the 6230 mainly because I understand you can put a
chip
quote:
> in it to expand it's memory capacity. Am I correct in assuming this would
> let me store many more contacts and appointments in the calendar? I would
> not need the memory for many pictures although MP3's would be nice. Does
> Nokia have a program similar to Motorola's Mobile Phone Tools? Of course
> there is THE RECEPTION QUESTION.. Does either have superior cell
reception?
quote:
> Your opinions please.
>
> The pluses & minuses as I see them:
>
> V3 Razr
> By far the better display and form factor.
> Mobile Phone Tools Software
>
> 6230
> Expandable memory (if it will do what I want - contacts & appointment
> mostly). I would like it to do enough of each
> that I could shelve my Palm Pilot a good deal of the time.
> Much better searches in the contact list
> More information re contacts (addresses, notes, etc.)
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
> Fred
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|