|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cellular phones topics > July 2005 > How does cellular technology affect phone cost?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
How does cellular technology affect phone cost?
|
|
| Winton Goyal 2005-07-16, 6:55 am |
| There are many low cost phones under $50, and many that cost $100 to almost
$300 dollars. So my question is what is it in the technology or electronics
of the phone that can allow for the difference in cost?
| |
| Cyrus Afzali 2005-07-16, 6:55 am |
| On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:10:53 GMT, "Winton Goyal"
<winton11@verizon.net> wrote:
quote:
>There are many low cost phones under $50, and many that cost $100 to almost
>$300 dollars. So my question is what is it in the technology or electronics
>of the phone that can allow for the difference in cost?
>
It's a combination of technology and marketing. The lower-cost phones
indeed do have fewer advanced features and can be made at a lower
cost. The introductory phones will basically be good only for making
phone calls. You can forget about browsing the Internetl, taking
pictures with a built-in camera, etc.
The higher-end phones are made with advanced features that often cater
to business-oriented users. For example, a Treo handheld can basically
do all the common communication functions a business person might
want, including browsing standard Internet sites, sending and
receiving e-mails, opening file attachments, etc. That functionality
costs more to include in a phone.
As for subsidies, more actual dollars are spent on subsidizing the
higher-cost phones because those people represent higher-margin
customers. Given the fact that phone companies buy their devices in
bulk, they can get entry-level phones at relatively low cost and still
afford to give those customers subsidies.
| |
| Steve Sobol 2005-07-16, 6:55 am |
| Winton Goyal wrote:
quote:
> There are many low cost phones under $50,
No, there aren't.
There are many phones *discounted* to $50 or less, but there are no phones
that actually retail for that low an amount.
--
JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / sjsobol@JustThe.net / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the
temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638)
"Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"
| |
| John S. 2005-07-16, 4:55 pm |
|
"Winton Goyal" <winton11@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:N0_Be.3001$Zu1.1033@trnddc04...
quote:
> There are many low cost phones under $50, and many that cost $100 to
> almost
> $300 dollars. So my question is what is it in the technology or
> electronics
> of the phone that can allow for the difference in cost?
It's definatly not the technology.
Features. Things like cameras, more memory positions for say 500 phone book
entries instead of 250, (some like) flip phones, bluetooth, infared etc.....
It's the othere thngs that make them cost and not the technology.
| |
| Joseph 2005-07-16, 10:55 pm |
| On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:10:53 GMT, "Winton Goyal"
<winton11@verizon.net> wrote:
quote:
>There are many low cost phones under $50, and many that cost $100 to almost
>$300 dollars. So my question is what is it in the technology or electronics
>of the phone that can allow for the difference in cost?
Easy. Features! You can get a Nokia 2190 which is extremely no
frills and will get the job done or you can spend thousands of dollars
for a Vertu. Each has a market and a need. Not everyone needs a
phone that has precious gemstones in it and likewise not everyone
needs a barebones simple phone either.
- -
| |
| DevilsPGD 2005-07-24, 1:56 pm |
| In message < db9t7o$nhb$2@ratbert
.glorb.com> Steve Sobol
<sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
>Winton Goyal wrote:
>
>No, there aren't.
>
>There are many phones *discounted* to $50 or less, but there are no phones
>that actually retail for that low an amount.
Boost Mobile's i215 is $49.90 flat out, no contract, nothing else.
--
Don't you hate rhetorical questions?
|
|
|
|
|