|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cellular GSM Technology > September 2005 > T-mobile service unreliable in Bay Area
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
T-mobile service unreliable in Bay Area
|
|
| guptan@hotmail.com 2005-09-20, 5:48 pm |
| This is just to warn everyone about the varying coverage of T-mobile in
silicon valley. I get zero signals in some parts of sunnyvale and
cupertino. If you work in companies like Apple, HP, situated in that
area you already know that.
T-mobile stores keep on promising better coverage, but lost calls
should be history by now considering the advances in cell phone
technology and we are sitting in the most tech developed area of the
world. Its a shame.
| |
| John Navas 2005-09-20, 5:48 pm |
| [POSTED TO alt.cellular.gsm - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <1127240580.881443.86500@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on 20 Sep 2005
11:23:00 -0700, guptan@hotmail.com wrote:
>This is just to warn everyone about the varying coverage of T-mobile in
>silicon valley. I get zero signals in some parts of sunnyvale and
>cupertino. If you work in companies like Apple, HP, situated in that
>area you already know that.
>T-mobile stores keep on promising better coverage, but lost calls
>should be history by now considering the advances in cell phone
>technology and we are sitting in the most tech developed area of the
>world. Its a shame.
It's a shame that local communities are so hostile to cell tower siting, which
is a big part of your problem.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
| |
| Ralph5407 2005-09-20, 11:48 pm |
|
]
It's a shame that local communities are so hostile to cell tower
siting, which
is a big part of your problem.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular
Why shouldn't local communities be hostile to cell towers, they have
every right to object to these unsightly things blighting the
countryside. Not everybody wants to be in constant touch, how did the
world manage 30 years ago when there was no such thing as a cell phone.
Strangely enough we did survive, and very well thank you.
--
Ralph5407
| |
| John Navas 2005-09-21, 5:48 pm |
| [POSTED TO alt.cellular.gsm - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <Ralph5407.1vojmo@mobile-forum.co.uk> on Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:27:22 +0100,
Ralph5407 <Ralph5407.1vojmo@mobile-forum.co.uk> wrote:
>It's a shame that local communities are so hostile to cell tower
>siting, which
>is a big part of your problem.
>Why shouldn't local communities be hostile to cell towers, they have
>every right to object to these unsightly things blighting the
>countryside. Not everybody wants to be in constant touch, how did the
>world manage 30 years ago when there was no such thing as a cell phone.
>Strangely enough we did survive, and very well thank you.
My point is that you can't have it both ways, excellent coverage (per the
quote in my post that you snipped) without towers. In the future, kindly
refrain from changing the context with that kind of selective quoting.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
|
|
|
|
|