Cellular forums Home > Archive > Bluetooth discussion > January 2006 > Choice of good reception phone w/ bluetooth adapter or Treo 650 and reportedly poorer carrier recep









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Choice of good reception phone w/ bluetooth adapter or Treo 650 and reportedly poorer carrier recep
Roger Behrings

2006-01-08, 11:48 pm

Is the signal holding capability of the Treo 650 as relatively poor as
many users report ?
There are newer versions of Bluetooth adapters, for non bluetooth
phones, that seems to be superior and smaller that the earlier
generations.
The question becomes if it is just better overall to use the tried and
true reception tested Sanyo phones, such as the 4920, and add a
bluetooth adapter and have the proven reception capability - than to
go with a bluetooth enabled phone for Sprint - namely the Treo 650
which users seem to think has poor reception capabilities.

I get the impression that the newer bluetooth adapters for non
bluetooth phones are much better and smaller.

There may have been firmware updates etc. to the Treo phones, but such
reports about poor signal reception have been posted in forums.

Roger

PS two locations, but important enough

LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com