Cellular forums Home > Archive > AT-T wireless service > August 2005 > FAQ: Does ENS make for better coverage and/or connections?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author FAQ: Does ENS make for better coverage and/or connections?
John Navas

2005-08-10, 2:48 am

Post-merger Cingular still has two separate networks, the old ATTWS (blue)
network and the old Cingular (orange) network. While both ATTWS and Cingular
customers can now freely roam on the other network, thus given all subscribers
the same coverage, frequency band issues aside, the difference is that such
roaming can only happen when there is no "usable" home network signal, and a
"usable" signal can actually be pretty crappy.

In other words, ATTWS (blue) handsets will only roam on the Cingular (orange)
network if there is no "usable" ATTWS (blue) network signal, and vice versa,
even with ENS. Thus in any given location a blue handset may get much better
service (on the blue network) than an orange handset (given a "usable" orange
signal), and vice versa.

The new Cingular ENS handsets and Cingular (orange) 64K SIMs (if you have
both) make it possible for Cingular to manually change your "home" network (to
blue or orange) OTA (over the air), thus giving subscribers the better of the
two networks until the two networks are actually integrated. However, even
with ENS, the handset still *isn't* able to automatically select the better
network signal -- GSM roaming rules still apply.

LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com