|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > AT-T wireless service > September 2006 > CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
|
|
| John Navas 2006-09-01, 10:33 am |
| CHARTER:
This newsgroup is for discussion of topics directly related to Cingular
Wireless service, including voice, data (GPRS as well as GSM), and fax.
Non-commercial For Sale and Want To Buy notices for compatible products,
tagged in the subject line with "FS" and "WTB" respectively (without the
quote symbols), are permitted. All articles must be in plain text only,
in the English language, and human-readable.
Inappropriate (banned) articles:
* Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service)
* Binaries (except for appended text-encoded digital signatures)
* Spam (including excessive cross-posting)
* Make-money-fast or other chain or fraudulent schemes
* Work-at-home or other scams
* Commercial advertisements, "infomercials," or announcements
* Auction notices (e.g., eBay)
* Forged articles (anonymous articles are allowed)
* Personal insults or repetitive flaming (attacks)
* Employment (help and/or position wanted) notices
MODERATOR INFO:
The group is unmoderated.
| |
| Jackzwick 2006-09-01, 12:33 pm |
| In article <2jYJg.23247$5i3.4114@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
> CHARTER:
>
> This newsgroup is for discussion of topics directly related to Cingular
> Wireless service, including voice, data (GPRS as well as GSM), and fax.
> Non-commercial For Sale and Want To Buy notices for compatible products,
> tagged in the subject line with "FS" and "WTB" respectively (without the
> quote symbols), are permitted. All articles must be in plain text only,
> in the English language, and human-readable.
>
> Inappropriate (banned) articles:
> * Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service)
> * Binaries (except for appended text-encoded digital signatures)
> * Spam (including excessive cross-posting)
> * Make-money-fast or other chain or fraudulent schemes
> * Work-at-home or other scams
> * Commercial advertisements, "infomercials," or announcements
> * Auction notices (e.g., eBay)
> * Forged articles (anonymous articles are allowed)
> * Personal insults or repetitive flaming (attacks)
> * Employment (help and/or position wanted) notices
>
> MODERATOR INFO:
>
> The group is unmoderated.
Since the Group is unmoderated, there is no method of enforcing any of
the above, some of which are regularly violated by the OP.
| |
| Anonyma 2006-09-01, 3:33 pm |
| In article <2jYJg.23247$5i3.4114@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
> CHARTER:
>
Unenforceable charter posting laughed at.
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2006-09-01, 3:33 pm |
| Why are some folks so rude to Navas? How does he violate the terms of
service that he has posted below? Other than being a Cingular bigot, what is
the problem with John Navas? He seems to be helpful to folks that post here
in search of advice regarding Cingular.
"Jackzwick" <jackzwick@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:jackzwick-FBA2ED.12231101092006@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net...
> In article <2jYJg.23247$5i3.4114@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
>
> Since the Group is unmoderated, there is no method of enforcing any of
> the above, some of which are regularly violated by the OP.
| |
| Thomas T. Veldhouse 2006-09-01, 3:33 pm |
| In alt.cellular.cingular Mij Adyaw <mij@thebitbucket.com> wrote:
> Why are some folks so rude to Navas? How does he violate the terms of
> service that he has posted below? Other than being a Cingular bigot, what is
> the problem with John Navas? He seems to be helpful to folks that post here
> in search of advice regarding Cingular.
>
What does his "CHARTER" have to do with alt.cellular.attws? Funny ... John
posted it there. Remember, when you answer that question, that the CHARTER is
a newsgroup charter.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
| |
|
| Mij Adyaw wrote:
> Why are some folks so rude to Navas? How does he violate the terms of
> service that he has posted below?
He often posts off-topic posts in this and other newsgroups, but what
many people object to is his endless reposting of the charter, including
posting it to other groups to which the charter has no relevance
(alt.cellular.attws). It's as if he's terrified that when (and if) the
Cingular name is dropped, that Usenet readers and posters will migrate
to the old alt.cellular.attws, a group that doesn't have a charter
written by him. So he's desperately trying to extend the
alt.cellular.cingular charter onto alt.cellular.attws (at least that's
the only explanation anyone's come up with for why he's posting a
charter into a group that it doesn't apply to).
If he would stick to simply helping people when they have a technical
question about something like setting up data services, then there
wouldn't be any objections at all.
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2006-09-01, 10:33 pm |
| Now it is clear to me. Thanks for the detailed explanation. :-)
"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:44f89eb0$0$9618
3$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> Mij Adyaw wrote:
>
> He often posts off-topic posts in this and other newsgroups, but what many
> people object to is his endless reposting of the charter, including
> posting it to other groups to which the charter has no relevance
> (alt.cellular.attws). It's as if he's terrified that when (and if) the
> Cingular name is dropped, that Usenet readers and posters will migrate to
> the old alt.cellular.attws, a group that doesn't have a charter written by
> him. So he's desperately trying to extend the alt.cellular.cingular
> charter onto alt.cellular.attws (at least that's the only explanation
> anyone's come up with for why he's posting a charter into a group that it
> doesn't apply to).
>
> If he would stick to simply helping people when they have a technical
> question about something like setting up data services, then there
> wouldn't be any objections at all.
| |
| DecaturTxCowboy 2006-09-02, 10:33 am |
| Mij Adyaw wrote:
> Why are some folks so rude to Navas?
No one is being rude to Navas, we're just being rude to:
Self-styled experts (Googleites) that provide erroneous or misleading
information and then back pedal to mitigate their guffaw.
"Moderators" that insult the intelligence of people with more
professional experience by the use of an illogical reasoning model, but
use the same model to support their own fantasies.
People that run away from an argument once they realize they are way
over their head.
|
|
|
|
|