Cellular forums Home > Archive > AT-T wireless service > January 2007 > Re: Cingular to change name









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Cingular to change name
SinghaLvr

2007-01-06, 10:34 pm

On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:16:30 -0500, SMS wrote
(in article < 459be4e9$0$68990$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net> ):

> Dave wrote:
>
> True, but non-AT&T Wireless customers, about 75% of total subscribers,
> don't have that experience to remember. AT&T Wireless customers that
> left prior to the plunge in quality and service still have good memories
> of AT&T. I recall when my wife's purse was stolen with her AT&T Wireless
> phone. They sent out a new handset, and didn't even charge us for it,
> though we had no insurance on the phone, and though her rate plan was a
> very inexpensive plan ($10 per month and 25¢ per minute).
>
> AT&T had excellent customer service and the best rate plans for quite a
> few years. Since I was long gone from AT&T by the time they went into
> the dumper, I only know of the issues from disgruntled customers.
>
> In my area, the corporate customers mostly moved to Verizon when AT&T
> began to deteriorate. At the time there was really no other option as
> Cingular was just starting operations in my area and their network was
> very poor (a 1900 MHz only GSM network), and Sprint has always had poor
> coverage in my area.


I think many customers have nostalgic feelings toward AT&T. Even when
thinking about the big ol' monopoly. The problem of course is that after the
phone company was broken into the Regional Bells many of the bells had
horrible service in comparison with what AT&T used to provide. Even worse
most persons didn't have a choice for local service but to use their now
castrated local Bell company. (I personally remember horrible experiences
with Bell Atlantic when we used to have decent service with AT&T.) I don't
remember the bill going down after the break-up either. (Other than for Long
Distance and phone rental fees).

Jeffrey Kaplan

2007-01-06, 10:34 pm

It is alleged that Thurman claimed:

> My only complaints are:
> Pocket Media Player, will not play cda files that play on WinXP Media
> Player.


cda files are "CD Audio", they exist on CDs only. Rip/convert to mp3
or wma.

> The included earbuds were apparently assembled by a 6 year old on his first
> day at work in China; one strand is 6" long, the other is 20" long. It's


That would be because they're designed to hang down on one side only.
Put the shorter one in your ear, then loop the other one around the
back of your neck to your other ear.

--
Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org
The from userid is killfiled Send personal mail to gordol

"Then, as you so concisely say, 'Boom.'" (G'kar, B5 "Z'Ha'Dum")
Thurman

2007-01-06, 10:34 pm


"Jeffrey Kaplan" <nomail@gordol.org> wrote in message
news:3o10q21va5vgeu8
cdc0ti20jmmn4ee0vqb@
gordol.org...
> It is alleged that Thurman claimed:
>
>
> cda files are "CD Audio", they exist on CDs only. Rip/convert to mp3
> or wma.
>
>
> That would be because they're designed to hang down on one side only.
> Put the shorter one in your ear, then loop the other one around the
> back of your neck to your other ear.


LOL!

I thought you were going to tell me to wrap the 20" cord around my neck and
jump!

Thanks for the tips.


LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com