|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > AT-T wireless service > January 2007 > Cingular to AT&T Explanation Video
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Cingular to AT&T Explanation Video
|
|
|
| "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj1Mtv9cD0I"
| |
| Mike S. 2007-01-20, 10:33 am |
|
In article < 45b1775a$0$68947$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj1Mtv9cD0I"
Absolutely hilarious ... except when you realize that all of the
information presented there is probably historically accurate.
| |
|
| Mike S. wrote:
> In article < 45b1775a$0$68947$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>
> Absolutely hilarious ... except when you realize that all of the
> information presented there is probably historically accurate.
>
>
Yessir, it is.
--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
| |
| BruceR 2007-01-20, 12:33 pm |
| There's only one minor, nit picky item that's incorrect but poetic
license forgives it. The deathstar logo didn't appear till 1/1/84, the
date of the breakup. Up till then, AT&T and it's affiliated companies
used the stylized Bell logo which remained available to the "baby Bells"
but not to AT&T. So, at the end of the video, where they show how AT&T
went to at&t, they should have used the Bell logo. But, like I said, the
graphic is funnier with the old and new deathstar and I'm REALLY picking
nits in what is a truly a brilliant piece of comedy that is dead on
accurate.
Mike S. wrote:
> In article < 45b1775a$0$68947$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>
> Absolutely hilarious ... except when you realize that all of the
> information presented there is probably historically accurate.
| |
| karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net 2007-01-20, 3:33 pm |
| On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:58:43 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote:
>"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj1Mtv9cD0I"
It's all true, no exageration. As a matter of fact he left out SBC
buying PacBell.
| |
|
| karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:58:43 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> It's all true, no exageration. As a matter of fact he left out SBC
> buying PacBell.
He also left out BellSouth evolving from Southern Bell.
|
|
|
|
|