|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > AT-T wireless service > March 2007 > Re: Calls Dropped Continually
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Calls Dropped Continually
|
|
|
| Scott wrote:
>
> We need more than anecdotal claims, Mr. Novice.
Well at least it's tacit acknowledgment that the signal was bad before!
The east bay, including Lafayette, Orinda, and Moraga, as well as the
tri-valley area has been especially problematic for Cingular coverage
until recently. I noticed that Pleasanton, east of Santa Rita road, is
much improved recently as well, but I haven't been out on 24 in a while
to check. It'll be interesting to see what the surveys show next year
and in 2009. Cingular may finally be getting their act together and
within two years may have coverage as good as Verizon's.
[Copied to alt.cellular.attws. Please post all alt.cellular.cingular
posts to alt.cellular.attws as well. The Cingular name is going away,
and alt.cellular.attws is the proper venue for posts regarding AT&T's
Wireless Service.]
| |
| John Navas 2007-03-17, 4:33 am |
| On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:09:51 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in < 45f9ee62$0$27183$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>Scott wrote:
>
>
>Well at least it's tacit acknowledgment that the signal was bad before!
On the contrary -- it's just not 5 bars all the way. My V551 has been
able to hold a call along that route for quite a long time.
>The east bay, including Lafayette, Orinda, and Moraga, as well as the
>tri-valley area has been especially problematic for Cingular coverage
>until recently.
Only if you have a crap phone.
>I noticed that Pleasanton, east of Santa Rita road, is
>much improved recently as well, but I haven't been out on 24 in a while
>to check. It'll be interesting to see what the surveys show next year
>and in 2009. Cingular may finally be getting their act together and
>within two years may have coverage as good as Verizon's.
Actually better than Verizon in the East Bay for years.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
| |
|
| John Navas < spamfilter1@navasgro
up.com> wrote in
news:k8emv2tf0umqeja
uojckgefr2hisokanr9@
4ax.com:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:09:51 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> wrote in < 45f9ee62$0$27183$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>
>
> On the contrary -- it's just not 5 bars all the way. My V551 has been
> able to hold a call along that route for quite a long time.
>
>
> Only if you have a crap phone.
>
Cingular uses crap phones? Can I quote you on that? It makes it so much
easier to fight your own outlandish claims with your own words.
|
|
|
|
|