| John Navas 2007-04-30, 10:33 pm |
| On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:25:57 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in < 46353796$0$27181$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>Sorry, I go by all the independent surveys, which have very high sample
>sizes and extremely low margins of error.
What you actually do is make things up that are demonstrably wrong, as
in claims of coverage completely at odds with Verizon's own coverage
maps. (Oops.)
As for the surveys, they actually show relatively small differences that
are comparable to the margins of error.
>Navas goes by a sample of one,
>himself. Amusingly, not even Cingular itself claims a coverage
>advantage. They have the "fewest dropped calls" campaign, but they are
>very careful to never claim the widest coverage. Of course the "fewest
>dropped calls" claim has been proven to be untrue...
Really? Proof? Or just another made up claim? ;)
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
|