| Author |
CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
|
|
| John Navas 2007-05-07, 12:33 pm |
| CHARTER:
This newsgroup is for discussion of topics directly related to Cingular
Wireless service, including voice, data (GPRS as well as GSM), and fax.
Non-commercial For Sale and Want To Buy notices for compatible products,
tagged in the subject line with "FS" and "WTB" respectively (without the
quote symbols), are permitted. All articles must be in plain text only,
in the English language, and human-readable.
Inappropriate (banned) articles:
* Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service)
* Binaries (except for appended text-encoded digital signatures)
* Spam (including excessive cross-posting)
* Make-money-fast or other chain or fraudulent schemes
* Work-at-home or other scams
* Commercial advertisements, "infomercials," or announcements
* Auction notices (e.g., eBay)
* Forged articles (anonymous articles are allowed)
* Personal insults or repetitive flaming (attacks)
* Employment (help and/or position wanted) notices
MODERATOR INFO:
The group is unmoderated.
| |
| Scott 2007-05-07, 10:33 pm |
| John Navas < spamfilter1@navasgro
up.com> wrote in news:2sI%h.113691
$VU4.19921@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> CHARTER:
>
> This newsgroup is for discussion of topics directly related to Cingular
> Wireless service, including voice, data (GPRS as well as GSM), and fax.
Sorry- this is not a part of the alt.cellular.attws charter. Your document
does not apply.
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2007-05-08, 4:33 am |
| Where is the charter for alt.cellular.attws. Someone should post the
charter, otherwise the Charter that Mr Navas has been posting may apply.
"Scott" <how.do@you.do> wrote in message
news:CpWdnUpStrfrL6L
bnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@ad
elphia.com...
> John Navas < spamfilter1@navasgro
up.com> wrote in news:2sI%h.113691
> $VU4.19921@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
>
>
> Sorry- this is not a part of the alt.cellular.attws charter. Your
> document
> does not apply.
>
>
| |
|
| "Mij Adyaw" wrote ...[color=darkred]
>
> Where is the charter for alt.cellular.attws. Someone should post the
> charter, otherwise the Charter that Mr Navas has been posting may apply.
>
> "Scott" <how.do@you.do> wrote in message
> news:CpWdnUpStrfrL6L
bnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@ad
elphia.com...
Let's take a vote ... all those who think the Navas charter should apply to
Mij and Navas ONLY raise your hands.
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2007-05-08, 3:33 pm |
| I raise my hand :-)
"Jeff" <nada@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:GN_%h.7902$rO7.4280@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> "Mij Adyaw" wrote ...
>
> Let's take a vote ... all those who think the Navas charter should apply
> to Mij and Navas ONLY raise your hands.
>
| |
|
| Mij Adyaw wrote:
> Where is the charter for alt.cellular.attws. Someone should post the
> charter, otherwise the Charter that Mr Navas has been posting may apply.
Charters are written when the group is formed. Trying to apply a charter
from one group to another group is very strange indeed, but most of us
no longer are surprised by anything Navas does.
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2007-05-08, 10:33 pm |
| Thanks for the explanation. I was under the incorrect assumption that Mr
Navas had created the usenet group.
"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:46410a01$0$2725
3$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> Mij Adyaw wrote:
>
> Charters are written when the group is formed. Trying to apply a charter
> from one group to another group is very strange indeed, but most of us no
> longer are surprised by anything Navas does.
| |
| Kevin Weaver 2007-05-08, 10:33 pm |
| Only In his dreams.
But It's what he wants everyone to think.
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote in message
news:ja90i.75932$Fk2.49604@newsfe08.phx...
> Thanks for the explanation. I was under the incorrect assumption that Mr
> Navas had created the usenet group.
>
> "SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
> news:46410a01$0$2725
3$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>
>
| |
| Elmo P. Shagnasty 2007-05-08, 10:33 pm |
| In article <5P90i.2044$zj3.685@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>,
"Kevin Weaver" < kevinkeithweaver@sbc
global.net> wrote:
> Only In his dreams.
>
> But It's what he wants everyone to think.
Navas's wet dreams, that is.
| |
| Thomas T. Veldhouse 2007-05-09, 12:33 pm |
| In alt.cellular.cingular Mij Adyaw <mij@spambucket.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. I was under the incorrect assumption that Mr
> Navas had created the usenet group.
>
You already knew [a long time ago] that he didn't create the group. Your
leading style of antagonism isn't pleasant.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: D281 77A5 63EE 82C5 5E68 00E4 7868 0ADC 4EFB 39F0
| |
|
| He created alt.cellular.cingular, but had nothing to do with
alt.cellular.attws.
What happened is that he became extremely worried when AT&T decided to
change the name of their wireless service from Cingular to AT&T. He saw
what happened when T-Mobile changed the name of their U.S. wireless
service from Voicestream to T-Mobile. The
alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream group became dormant, and
alt.cellular.t-mobile became the active group.
Many people thought it strange that he came out so vehemently against
the creation of alt.cellular.t-mobile, because not only did no carrier
with the name of Voicestream exist anymore, the old name was unwieldy,
with two unnecessary layers of hierarchy.
The reason for his opposition was that he was worried that the same sort
of transition would occur from alt.cellular.cingular to alt.cellular.attws.
Technically, the alt.cellular.attws group was for AT&T Wireless, which
was a spinoff of AT&T, so you could argue that the new group for
Cingular should really be called alt.cellular.att, rather than
alt.cellular.attws, but practically speaking, it's better to just use
the existing attws newsgroup rather to create a new one. The problem for
Navas is that the attws newsgroup was not his creation. He is spamming
the alt.cellular.cingular charter into alt.celluar.attws in an effort to
claim "transfer" rights of his charter. It's similar to the Nextel
versus AT&T tiff in NASCAR, where AT&T wants to change Cingular to AT&T
on the car they sponsor, even though this is not permitted by the
Cingular contract with Nascar.
Everyone would prefer that he stop spamming, which is of course why he
continues spamming.
Mij Adyaw wrote:[color=darkred
]
> Thanks for the explanation. I was under the incorrect assumption that Mr
> Navas had created the usenet group.
>
> "SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
> news:46410a01$0$2725
3$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
..
| |
|
| In article <NCm0i.73$vq6.18@textfe.usenetserver.com>,
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In alt.cellular.cingular Mij Adyaw <mij@spambucket.com> wrote:
>
> You already knew [a long time ago] that he didn't create the group. Your
> leading style of antagonism isn't pleasant.
Exactly.
| |
|
| mij, how's your fleshlight business?
In article <6_20i.75705$Fk2.13883@newsfe08.phx>,
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote:
> I raise my hand :-)
>
>
> "Jeff" <nada@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:GN_%h.7902$rO7.4280@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>
>
>
>
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2007-05-10, 4:33 am |
| Tommy,
You are incorrect. I know that he created one of the cellular newsgroups.
You should get your facts straight before replying. I accept your apology.
-mij
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NCm0i.73$vq6.18@textfe.usenetserver.com...
> In alt.cellular.cingular Mij Adyaw <mij@spambucket.com> wrote:
>
> You already knew [a long time ago] that he didn't create the group. Your
> leading style of antagonism isn't pleasant.
>
> --
> Thomas T. Veldhouse
> Key Fingerprint: D281 77A5 63EE 82C5 5E68 00E4 7868 0ADC 4EFB 39F0
>
>
| |
| Elmo P. Shagnasty 2007-05-10, 7:33 am |
| In article <nospam-FEF78A. 22553809052007@newsc
lstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
sw <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> mij, how's your fleshlight business?
usually, you don't ask that of the guy who's BUYING all the product.
|
|
|
|