Cellular forums Home > Archive > AT-T wireless service > July 2007 > Use the iPhone without AT&T









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Use the iPhone without AT&T
karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net

2007-07-05, 3:33 pm


No phone calls, but the iPod and WiFi allegedly work without
activating using

the hack published online.

http://nanocr.eu/2007/07/03/iphone-without-att/
Bill Kraski

2007-07-06, 4:33 am

karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:

>
> No phone calls, but the iPod and WiFi allegedly work without
> activating using
>
> the hack published online.
>
> http://nanocr.eu/2007/07/03/iphone-without-att/


Maybe I'm missing something, here. Why spend the kind of money they're
getting for an iPhone just for overly small internet screen, usable
only when you have WiFi available, & a portable music player? Or is
the toy aspect of the iPhone so "wonderful" that a usable phone is
unnecessary?

--
Bill K
Jer

2007-07-06, 10:33 am

Bill Kraski wrote:
> karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:
>
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, here. Why spend the kind of money they're
> getting for an iPhone just for overly small internet screen, usable
> only when you have WiFi available, & a portable music player? Or is
> the toy aspect of the iPhone so "wonderful" that a usable phone is
> unnecessary?
>



If memory serves, certain people would spend $20 for a paste-on cell
antenna so they could look cool. These are same people who now spend
$$$ to pimp their bling cars with bling sound systems while wearing
bling jewelry, and now bling phones. There are enough of these idiots
to keep the scammers happy, and the rest of us laughing into next week.

--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net

2007-07-07, 7:33 am

On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:13:46 -0500, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:

>Bill Kraski wrote:
>
>
>If memory serves, certain people would spend $20 for a paste-on cell
>antenna so they could look cool. These are same people who now spend
>$$$ to pimp their bling cars with bling sound systems while wearing
>bling jewelry, and now bling phones. There are enough of these idiots
>to keep the scammers happy, and the rest of us laughing into next week.



Seems like an iPhone is great to have when stormy weather knocks down
power lines to your home. You'd still be able to send email.
Bill Kraski

2007-07-07, 7:33 am

karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:

> Seems like an iPhone is great to have when stormy weather knocks down
> power lines to your home. You'd still be able to send email.


That description sounds just like my 8525, either standalone or
tethered to my laptop. And, in the case of either phone, it'd depend
on the state of the battery.

--
Bill K
Todd Allcock

2007-07-07, 3:33 pm

At 07 Jul 2007 06:04:17 -0500 karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:

> Seems like an iPhone is great to have when stormy weather knocks down
> power lines to your home. You'd still be able to send email.



Yes. Just like I did seven years ago tethering a Casiopeia E-115 to a
Nokia 7160 via IR.

Hope you weren't waiting all these years for an iPhone just to have e-
mail when the power goes out!



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Scott

2007-07-07, 10:33 pm

karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote in
news:3osu83l8es8krhr
01tjth6n3fg5241m3hj@
4ax.com:

> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:13:46 -0500, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:
>
>
>
> Seems like an iPhone is great to have when stormy weather knocks down
> power lines to your home. You'd still be able to send email.
>


But no better than any other phone.
karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net

2007-07-08, 4:33 am

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 11:12:32 GMT, "Bill Kraski"
<Bill.Kraski.NoSpam@verizon.invalid> wrote:

> karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:
>
>
>That description sounds just like my 8525, either standalone or
>tethered to my laptop. And, in the case of either phone, it'd depend
>on the state of the battery.



I had an 8525, sold it on ebay, if was awful.
karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net

2007-07-08, 4:33 am

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:44:35 -0500, Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:

> karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote in
> news:3osu83l8es8krhr
01tjth6n3fg5241m3hj@
4ax.com:
>
>
>But no better than any other phone.


Oh, which other phone has a 3 1/2 inch screen? , let alone
one that isnt scratchable plastic.

Scott

2007-07-08, 4:33 am

karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote in
news:vao09318o2pqmim
9uocossfikctars4k3v@
4ax.com:

> On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:44:35 -0500, Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>
>
> Oh, which other phone has a 3 1/2 inch screen? , let alone
> one that isnt scratchable plastic.
>
>


If the screen is the only thing you can point to, you prove my point. It is
no more effective at the task than any other phone.

Thanks for playing- now you go back to creating your latest conspiracy
theory.
Bill Kraski

2007-07-08, 3:33 pm

karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:

> I had an 8525, sold it on ebay, if was awful.


I'll assume you had a lemon. Mine works quite well. And the
pda/minicomputer aspect is as good as others I've used. Once there's a
complete upgrade to WM6 available, that's needed to fix some WM5
shortcomings. Otherwise, the spb tweaks, pocket e-sword & agendus were
all I really needed to add -- there don't really seem to be ANY really
good WM browsers.

--
Bill K
Michael Paris

2007-07-08, 10:33 pm


"Bill Kraski" <Bill.Kraski.NoSpam@verizon.invalid> wrote in message
news:Zsaki.2564$nQ4.952@trndny01...
> karlkrandall@sbcglob
al.net wrote:
>
>
> I'll assume you had a lemon. Mine works quite well. And the
> pda/minicomputer aspect is as good as others I've used. Once there's a
> complete upgrade to WM6 available, that's needed to fix some WM5
> shortcomings. Otherwise, the spb tweaks, pocket e-sword & agendus were
> all I really needed to add -- there don't really seem to be ANY really
> good WM browsers.
>
> --
> Bill K

To be honest, when I first got my 8525 it was clunky, but not terriable,
since the latest firmware was installed, it has improved dramatically, I
myself, prefer it over the iphone. I have no problems with those who think
otheriwse, they are aimed at different markets, but an 8525 without buying
on contract, is the same price as an iphone.

Michael Paris

2007-07-08, 10:33 pm


> Oh, which other phone has a 3 1/2 inch screen? , let alone
> one that isnt scratchable plastic.
>

I can get an N800 with a bigger screen, run it off a decent and cheap
Samsung Sync on hsdpa and do skype and other things. or as in an iphone,
use it off wifi, and guess what, I can add programs, chat on the irc, surf
the net and its a little over half the price of an iphone and don't need a
contract extentsion.

Kurt

2007-07-08, 10:33 pm

In article < gvWdneqX6s35DgzbnZ2d
neKdnZydnZ2d@comcast
.com>,
"Michael Paris" <mparis27@comcast.net> wrote:

> I can get an N800 with a bigger screen, run it off a decent and cheap
> Samsung Sync on hsdpa and do skype and other things. or as in an iphone,
> use it off wifi, and guess what, I can add programs, chat on the irc, surf
> the net and its a little over half the price of an iphone and don't need a
> contract extentsion.


You easily make up the difference on the data plan.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com