|
| Oxford <colalovesmacs@mac.com> wrote in
news:colalovesmacs-1E4B1F.22285824092007@mpls-nnrp-05.inet.qwest.net:
> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>
>
> what? you simply have users opt me out of any legal obligation upon
> connection. don't you understand how wireless works scott?
Your agreement with users will not supercede the TOS you agree to when
buying the pipeline. Don't you know how wireless works, Oxturd?
>
>
> But you are talking about the non-competitive cell world, not the
> computing industry where you have to make improvements in speed and
> PRICE... twice the speed and half the price every 18 months... it's
> called moore's law and it's going to wipe the cell industry out.
Where did I mention cellular, numbnuts? I was talking about the
computer world, simpleton. Twice the speed and the same price in the
real world.
>
> now that apple has entered the market, all old cell companies are
> finished, there is no way in hell they can compete against the iphone
> with free VoIP over free wifi.
Free wifi? You have been talking about not free wifi. You can't even
keep your own stories straight- the first clue showing total stupidity
and lack of fact.
>
>
> You just are in a non-competitive market, I can see that clearly from
> your comments. We'll wipe you out in 10 years... just watch.
Yeah- let me know how that works for you. Hopefully, you'll find that
dealing with old technology will get you nowhere. Wifi is so turn-of-
the century. But then again, you work with a second rate computer and
OS- you wouldn't know innovation if it came up to you with a name tag
on.
>
> There is no need for a "carrier" in the future, you just use a free
> connection... which makes MUCH more sense than paying someone.
>
And yet you can't answer the big questions. Which pipeline are you
going to use for this free wifi network? How are going to provide
acceptable speeds when a large number of users are plugged into your
hub? Who is if going to backhaul all of that traffic for free? How do
you propose getting around those areas of the internet pipeline that
require compensation and still provide accpetable performance?
I don't expect you to answer these, because they are apparently over
your head- you ignored them the first time they were asked. Another
sign of cluelessness.
|
|