Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cingular cell phone service > December 2005 > Navas has a clinical problem









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Navas has a clinical problem
Elmo P. Shagnasty

2005-12-16, 5:48 pm

In article <yKwof.160847$qk4.2741@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:

> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.cingular
> Subject: Re: GPRS/Edge in San Diego?
> References: <1134627648.063415.112160@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
> Message-ID: <yKwof.160847$qk4.2741@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 347496906a99c7601a60
10aa95e17a5b
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
> X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1134729246
> 347496906a99c7601a60
10aa95e17a5b (Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:34:06 GMT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:34:06 GMT
> Organization: AT&T Worldnet
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:34:06 GMT
> X-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:34:07 EST (be02)



And finally, after half an hour, he wrote:

> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.cingular
> Subject: Re: my wireless window
> References: <s%gof.4910$3Z.3136@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
> Message-ID: <M9xof.160923$qk4.62356@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 9e5019457bbc5f25d46e
eb36dfd2d20c
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
> X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1134730988
> 9e5019457bbc5f25d46e
eb36dfd2d20c (Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:03:08 GMT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:03:08 GMT
> Organization: AT&T Worldnet
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:03:08 GMT
> X-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:03:09 EST (be01)


From 2:30am PST to 3:03am PST, John sat down and spent that time in ONE
NEWSGROUP.

He has a problem.

John Navas

2005-12-16, 5:48 pm

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <elmop-21F7F6. 06175016122005@nntp1
.usenetserver.com> on Fri, 16 Dec 2005
06:17:50 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>From 2:30am PST to 3:03am PST, John sat down and spent that time in ONE
>NEWSGROUP.


I guess it hasn't occurred to you that I happened to be in a different time
zone. ;)

>He has a problem.


You're the one "analyzing" posting patterns. ;)

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q
>
Elmo P. Shagnasty

2005-12-16, 11:48 pm

In article <jrxof.160969$qk4.65256@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:

>
> I guess it hasn't occurred to you that I happened to be in a different time
> zone. ;)


It doesn't matter. You spent a full half-hour in the middle of the
night, regardless of time zone, in one newsgroup.

You have a problem.

Elmo P. Shagnasty

2005-12-16, 11:48 pm

In article <jrxof.160969$qk4.65256@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:

>
> You're the one "analyzing" posting patterns. ;)


When I fire up my newsreader and see nothing but John Navas postings,
I'm curious when they all came about.

The truth will out.

dold@XReXXNavas.usenet.us.com

2005-12-16, 11:48 pm

Elmo P. Shagnasty <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> When I fire up my newsreader and see nothing but John Navas postings,
> I'm curious when they all came about.


If he were in some other timezone, or awake at 2am, it would make sense
that a bunch of the latest posts would all be from him.

I leave my newsreader running while I do other things, coming back to it
throughout the day. What if I made one post at 10pm, and another at 6am.
Would you think I spent 8 hours "in" this newsgroup? What does "in" mean
in this context?

Why would it matter to you? John is certainly prolific in his posts, but I
don't see how it matters what the time or time span is.

Your first post on this shows up as Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:17:50 in my
newsreader, and this one at Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:17:39. What were you doing
in this newsgroup at 3am, and still here almost exactly thirteen hours
later?

--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5

Elmo P. Shagnasty

2005-12-17, 2:48 am

In article <dnvq3q$257$3@blue.rahul.net>, dold@XReXXNavas.usenet.us.com
wrote:

> I leave my newsreader running while I do other things, coming back to it
> throughout the day. What if I made one post at 10pm, and another at 6am.
> Would you think I spent 8 hours "in" this newsgroup? What does "in" mean
> in this context?


It means that I checked news at one point, then an hour later again, and
this newsgroup filled up with over a dozen posts--all from Navas, and
all within a half hour, and all in the middle of the night.

Elmo P. Shagnasty

2005-12-17, 2:48 am

In article <dnvq3q$257$3@blue.rahul.net>, dold@XReXXNavas.usenet.us.com
wrote:

> Your first post on this shows up as Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:17:50 in my
> newsreader, and this one at Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:17:39. What were you doing
> in this newsgroup at 3am, and still here almost exactly thirteen hours
> later?


Not still here--here again.

Jack Mac

2005-12-17, 5:48 pm

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:21:30 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com>
wrote:

>In article <dnvq3q$257$3@blue.rahul.net>, dold@XReXXNavas.usenet.us.com
>wrote:
>
>
>Not still here--here again.

AW come on Elmo!
Your anti-Navas triads are getting old.
Lay off.
Kill-file, there's a thought. Wonder if it works!

Jack Mac
Marty

2005-12-19, 11:48 pm

Somewhere around Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:17:09 -0500, while reading
alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from "Elmo P.
Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com>:

>In article <jrxof.160969$qk4.65256@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
>
>It doesn't matter. You spent a full half-hour in the middle of the
>night, regardless of time zone, in one newsgroup.
>
>You have a problem.


I don't really want to get pissed on in the middle of your pissing contest,
but I think most people will agree that you have the problem, not Navas.

The fact that you expect someone to defend why he made posts at whatever
time he made them, for a trifling 1/2 hour, is ludicrous and stupid.

--
Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2009 cellphonetopics.com