Cingular cell phone service - Re: Nayas Admits Errors, Promises to Be Honest Going Forward, Switches to Verizon

Author

Re: Nayas Admits Errors, Promises to Be Honest Going Forward, Switches to Verizon

Rico

2006-04-11, 5:48 pm

In article < e1bomo3c0sq002malch@
nntp.sonic.net>, malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar) wrote:
>In article <Hac_f.20789$Sf.1758@bignews6.bellsouth.net>, rico_001@hotmail.com
> (Rico) wrote:
>
>
>"They" are misguided.
>
>
>A classic example of what?
>
>I know many people who are active contributors within their
>community. Those same people also shop at Walmart.
>

Went right over your head, sorry should have been more detailed. What I
mean is by shopping with local merchants, they take the profits put them in
the local bank, spend the money in town supporting other local merchants
and local workers and on and on. Walmart every night sucks all the sales
from the previous day to Arkansas. Nothing illegal or immoral about it, but
very different then with the local store owner.

>Most of them probably support some local businesses that
>have offered them good friendly service.
>

fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.

John Navas

2006-04-19, 5:48 pm

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <eFS%f.950$oW1.7@bignews1.bellsouth.net> on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:27:26 GMT,
rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico) wrote:

>In article <MPG. 1ea84bf1dc6445fb9897
85@News.Individual.Net>, Philip J. Koenig < See_email_@ddress_be
low.This_one_is.invalid> wrote:

>
>You mean free trade doesn't create more good paying jobs in the US then it
>destroys. Go to your room and watch Fox and GE err NBC TV all next week.

Free trade clearly benefits us as a whole, and has created more good jobs than
have been lost. You can't really protect jobs by restricting trade -- all you
do is hurt everyone in the long run. You only protect jobs by becoming more
competitive and productive, which is what free trade is all about. Our low
unemployment is the envy of the world, so we're clearly doing something right.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>

Philip J. Koenig

2006-04-20, 2:48 am

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:01:47 GMT, in article <LGw1g.47799$1q4.6828@bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, John Navas writes...

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <eFS%f.950$oW1.7@bignews1.bellsouth.net> on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:27:26 GMT,
> rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico) wrote:
>
>
>
> Free trade clearly benefits us as a whole, and has created more good jobs than
> have been lost. You can't really protect jobs by restricting trade -- all you
> do is hurt everyone in the long run.

Obviously spoken from the myopic perspective of someone who lives
in and grew up in an economically-advantaged society, one which
tends to consistently benefit from these policies and such proxy
organizations as the IMF and the World Bank, since in many ways
what these advantaged societies are doing is funding their own
living standard by exploiting the cheap labor and low living
standards of less-advantaged countries.

> Our low unemployment is the envy of the world, so we're
> clearly doing something right.

What you are conveniently ignoring is various other economic
factors which are clearly going backwards, such as the US
living standard, poverty levels and the national debt. Duh!

--
* Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which *
* differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are *
* even incapable of forming such opinions. -- Albert Einstein *
* *
* To send email, remove numbers and spaces: pjkusenet64 @ ekahuna27 . com *
* Simple answers are for simple minds. Try a new way of looking at things. *

LinkBot