|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cingular cell phone service > December 2007 > Re: Google Maps for Mobile 2.0.1
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Google Maps for Mobile 2.0.1
|
|
| Todd Allcock 2007-12-19, 10:33 pm |
| At 19 Dec 2007 17:31:09 -0800 Ness-Net wrote:
> I have been extremely disappointed in Google mobile maps.
> map updates are very slow - and prone to lock up.
I haven't used Google seriously in awhile- I loaded 2.0 to check out the
cellular location feature (cute) but for day-to-day use, Windows Live
Search is the far better app.
> MS Live on the other hand is fast and never locks-up.
It's absolutely amazing on a WinMo device- even the new speech recognition
feature works quite well.
> I think Google (may) be good someday, but still needs work.
Both work well, IMO, and the fact that Google and MS continually try to one-
up the other in features make them both constantly improve. I can't
remember the last time I used a "real" (offline) GPS app on my WinMo phone-
WLS works well enough I (almost) don't miss spoken directions.
Neat (undocumented?) WinLive Search tip of the day: you can do reverse
phone lookups. Just enter a number in (xxx) yyy-zzzz or xxx-yyy-zzzz
format in the search bar and search. It works for both residential or
business listings.
| |
| dold@81.usenet.us.com 2007-12-19, 10:33 pm |
| Todd Allcock < elecconnec@americaon
line.com> wrote:
> I haven't used Google seriously in awhile- I loaded 2.0 to check out the
> cellular location feature (cute) but for day-to-day use, Windows Live
> Search is the far better app.
Where does one download Windows Live for a pedestrian cellphone like my
Nokia 6126?
Google Maps runs nicely on my phone. I don't know that I've ever had it
lock up, but I'm always interested in alternatives.
--
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley Lake, CA, USA GPS: 38.8,-122.5
| |
| Todd Allcock 2007-12-21, 10:33 pm |
| At 20 Dec 2007 22:37:52 +0000 dold@81.usenet.us.com wrote:
> Sort of on the same line of thought... Do you know where "live.com" gets
> its WiFi "locate me" information?
Sorry, I have no idea.
> I have visited a couple of hotspots
> whose WiFi gives a good "location", and others that show the location of
> their ISP.
I'll have to check it out, thanks.
| |
| John Navas 2007-12-26, 10:33 pm |
| On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:29:09 -0700, Todd Allcock
< elecconnec@AmericaOn
Line.com> wrote in <fkck33$vij$3@aioe.org>:
>At 19 Dec 2007 17:31:09 -0800 Ness-Net wrote:
Probably an older phone issue -- GMM was slow and unstable on my old
Moto V551, but is solid and fast on my Moto V3xx.
[color=darkred]
>I haven't used Google seriously in awhile- I loaded 2.0 to check out the
>cellular location feature (cute) but for day-to-day use, Windows Live
>Search is the far better app.
Because ... ?
I've tried the Windows Live Search browser interface at m.live.com, and
I personally prefer the results from Google, including GMM, GMail
Mobile, browser interface, and Opera for the full web version.
>Neat (undocumented?) WinLive Search tip of the day: you can do reverse
>phone lookups. Just enter a number in (xxx) yyy-zzzz or xxx-yyy-zzzz
>format in the search bar and search. It works for both residential or
>business listings.
I use Superpages Mobile, which does a better job for me than anything
else I've tried.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
|
|
|
|
|