|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cingular cell phone service > April 2007 > Re: "Cingular Hopes iPhone Will Distract Consumers From Unreliable Voice Service"
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: "Cingular Hopes iPhone Will Distract Consumers From Unreliable Voice Service"
|
|
| John Navas 2007-04-04, 3:33 pm |
| On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:51:56 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in < 4612f6ae$0$27229$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>See "http://wireless.seekingalpha.com/article/31344"
A personal blog. You'll clearly stoop to anything in your personal
crusade against Cingular. I would hope you have better things to do
with your time, but apparently not.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
| |
| Elmo P. Shagnasty 2007-04-04, 3:33 pm |
| In article < qtq7139gb41a34clk0gi
kpgfoi08kb7l1l@4ax.com>,
John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
> A personal blog. You'll clearly stoop to anything in your personal
> crusade against Cingular. I would hope you have better things to do
> with your time, but apparently not.
And how is that any different than your personal crusade to promote
Cingular? You do some things "for free" (yeah, right) in your spare
time that we ALL wonder about.
Why, when you don't work for Cingular, do you spend all this spare time
of yours promoting Cingular?
I think the answer to THAT one is very clear.
| |
|
| In article <elmop-9440EC. 14461904042007@nntp9
.usenetserver.com>,
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> In article < qtq7139gb41a34clk0gi
kpgfoi08kb7l1l@4ax.com>,
> John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
>
> And how is that any different than your personal crusade to promote
> Cingular? You do some things "for free" (yeah, right) in your spare
> time that we ALL wonder about.
>
> Why, when you don't work for Cingular, do you spend all this spare time
> of yours promoting Cingular?
>
> I think the answer to THAT one is very clear.
Yes this board seems to be his blog, and he does fashion himself as
moderator and arbiter of Netiquette for this group (some might say
"newsgroup police") and he does insist on getting in the last word on
any argument (you'll never win this one), but you do have a choice to
read or not.
Every group has one of these types of folks. Keeps them alive. On the
upside, look at all the entertainment it brings!
--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
| |
| John Navas 2007-04-07, 10:33 pm |
| On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 04:16:24 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in < 46177d89$0$27199$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>xPosTech wrote:
>
>
>S.O.P. for him.
SOP for you is ad hominem. Just shows you for what you are.
>There's an amusing story about the iPhone at
>"http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38757" regarding the
>battery life. 40 minutes of calling per charge actually doesn't sound
>unreasonable, considering the power requirements of the large screen,
>and it isn't clear what, if any, power reduction schemes were in place.
Actually pretty bad, both as compared to other phones on the market, and
as compared to as compared to typical phone use (the critical factor).
>I did a lot of battery life "tuning" on tablet PCs, and we could get a
>3x increase in battery life by various settings, though all of those
>changes affected usability (slowing down the processor, running the
>display at half brightness, shutting off peripherals when not in use and
>bringing them back up on-demand). I'm sure that by the time the iPhone
>is released that Apple will have the battery life up to at least two
>hours of talk time.
You're sure? Based on what? Wishful thinking? Like your other
forecasts? I personally consider it unlikely. Regardless, only time
will tell.
>The biggest design flaw of the iPhone is the non-user replaceable
>battery. People will put up with relatively short battery life as long
>as they have a way to change the battery.
You perhaps, but most people aren't at all interested in doing that.
The biggest design flaw is easily the closed system.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
|
|
|
|
|