|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cingular cell phone service > April 2007 > Re: 911 Call location accuracy
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: 911 Call location accuracy
|
|
|
| Todd Allcock wrote:
> Plus, nothing has prevented integration of GPS chips in GSM phones.
You're comparing apples and oranges.
The advantage of the Snaptrack system is that it's a hybrid system for
locating the phone.
The GPS applications you can run on a PDA phone are unrelated to LBS or
E-911. It's true that some of the GPS chip-equipped CDMA phones can run
other GPS applications, but there are also GSM phones with that capability.
It's in LBS services that require a high-degree of accuracy that the
CDMA carriers have an advantage. Personally I'm of the opinion that it's
really unethical to watch every move your employees make, but others
argue that since you're paying them, you have the right to track their
every move. Obviously the users of LBS and the service providers have
the latter opinion.
You'll get no argument from me that it sucks that you can't use you're
older phones on CDMA networks. Actually you can use them on some MVNO
networks, such as PagePlus. I also despise what companies like Verizon
do by defeaturing handsets to turn off functionality that the
manufacturer included. There are no saints here.
| |
| John Navas 2007-04-30, 10:33 pm |
| On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:08:39 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in < 46363eb6$0$27201$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>Todd Allcock wrote:
>
>
>You're comparing apples and oranges.
That's what you're doing.
>The advantage of the Snaptrack system is that it's a hybrid system for
>locating the phone.
The advantage of U-TDOA is that it's a system that works with _any_
phone.
>It's in LBS services that require a high-degree of accuracy that the
>CDMA carriers have an advantage. ...
There isn't actually a meaningful difference in LBS.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
|
|
|
|
|