Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cingular cell phone service > May 2007 > NEWS: World record GSM cell phone call from top of Mt Everest









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author NEWS: World record GSM cell phone call from top of Mt Everest
John Navas

2007-05-21, 10:33 pm

<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6676901.stm>

A British climber has set a world record by making a mobile phone
call from the top of Mount Everest.

[MORE]

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q
>
Anon E. Muss

2007-05-22, 4:33 am

On Tue, 22 May 2007 01:13:15 GMT, John Navas
< spamfilter1@navasgro
up.com> wrote:

><http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6676901.stm>
>
> A British climber has set a world record by making a mobile phone
> call from the top of Mount Everest.
>
> [MORE]


Sorry -- that connection was AMPS, not GSM.
John Henderson

2007-05-22, 4:33 am

Anon E. Muss wrote:

> Sorry -- that connection was AMPS, not GSM.


The Motorola Z8 certainly looks like a GSM/UMTS phone to me.

The summit is only 20 km from the new BTS:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;98123975

John

John Henderson

2007-05-22, 4:33 am

Anon E. Muss wrote:

> Sorry -- that connection was AMPS, not GSM.


[follow-ups corrected in this version]

The Motorola Z8 certainly looks like a GSM/UMTS phone to me.

The summit is only 20 km from the new BTS:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;98123975

John
Dennis Ferguson

2007-05-22, 12:33 pm

On 2007-05-22, Anon E Muss <anonymous@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 01:13:15 GMT, John Navas
>< spamfilter1@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry -- that connection was AMPS, not GSM.


That's so unlikely. The base station was in China and there's no
AMPS service there (nor anywhere outside the Americas that I know of).

Dennis Ferguson
John Navas

2007-05-22, 12:33 pm

On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:26:01 -0700, Anon E. Muss <anonymous@example.org>
wrote in < hmv453596ef7qq0vh2t2
jcaajmib08ahg1@4ax.com>:

>On Tue, 22 May 2007 01:13:15 GMT, John Navas
>< spamfilter1@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
>
>Sorry -- that connection was AMPS, not GSM.


Those connections were in fact GSM (not AMPS):
<http://www.cellular-news.com/story/23702.php>

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q
>
Thurman

2007-05-22, 3:33 pm


"John Navas" < spamfilter1@navasgro
up.com> wrote in message
news:229653dc1o8tuqf
6toqvrsr3mbn21o3uoe@
4ax.com...
>
> Those connections were in fact GSM (not AMPS):
> <http://www.cellular-news.com/story/23702.php>


I noticed he made a voice call and a SMS.

I keep waiting for someone to ask what data speeds he experienced. ;-)


John McGaw

2007-05-22, 3:33 pm

John Navas wrote:
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6676901.stm>
>
> A British climber has set a world record by making a mobile phone
> call from the top of Mount Everest.
>
> [MORE]
>


Yeah, but could he manage the same from the middle of West Virginia?

--
John McGaw
[Knoxville, TN, USA]
http://johnmcgaw.com
SMS

2007-05-22, 3:33 pm

John McGaw wrote:
> John Navas wrote:
>
> Yeah, but could he manage the same from the middle of West Virginia?


Why didn't he just use Extended Range GSM, LOL.
tmoran@acm.org

2007-05-22, 3:33 pm

>Yeah, but could he manage the same from the middle of West Virginia?
I saw on the news that thieves took info from a store's unsecured WiFi
using a Pringles can as an antenna while they parked at the far side of
the parking lot. Is there any similarly lo-tech antenna to improve the
range of a cell-phone?
Simon Templar

2007-05-22, 10:33 pm

tmoran@acm.org wrote:
> I saw on the news that thieves took info from a store's unsecured WiFi
> using a Pringles can as an antenna while they parked at the far side of
> the parking lot. Is there any similarly lo-tech antenna to improve the
> range of a cell-phone?


Of course you can build an antenna for GSM or any other type of mobile
or cell phone. The only problem with GSM is the timing, once you get
further away from the cell you will encroach on another user's time
slice and you will be booted even though you may well have a good signal.


--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/c...LIENT_NO=157452>
DTC

2007-05-22, 10:33 pm

SMS wrote:
> Why didn't he just use Extended Range GSM, LOL.


Mt. Everest is kinda a bit far from the Pacific coastline just a tad west
of San Francisco where Extended (range) GSM is currently deployed.
LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com