Cingular cell phone service - Time Magazine: The iPhone Dials Up the Competition

Author

Time Magazine: The iPhone Dials Up the Competition

Meg

2007-06-25, 10:33 pm

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/a...1635816,00.html

Justin

2007-06-25, 10:33 pm

Meg wrote on [26 Jun 2007 02:42:55 - 0000]:
> http://www.time.com/time/magazine/a...1635816,00.html

Quit spamming your wank.

Screw the iPhone

2007-06-25, 10:33 pm

On 26 Jun 2007 02:42:55 -0000, meagan34@gmail.com (Meg) wrote:

>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/a...1635816,00.html
>

I'm gonna laugh my XXX off when you whiney little babies get your
precious i(diot)Phones and discover what a horrible piece of shit it
actually is.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!

Michelle Steiner

2007-06-25, 10:33 pm

In article < tmv083deenrds22lk9v1
p1bvseo486qoi2@4ax.com>,
Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> On 26 Jun 2007 02:42:55 -0000, meagan34@gmail.com (Meg) wrote:
>
>
> I'm gonna laugh my XXX off when you whiney little babies get your
> precious i(diot)Phones and discover what a horrible piece of shit it
> actually is.
>
> HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!

I'll grant that you're an expert on shit, seeing as how that's what
you're made of, but that doesn't mean that you know shit about cell
phones.

You're just jealous because even though a child can use one intuitively,
you're too stupid to figure it out.

--
Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.

Screw the iPhone

2007-06-25, 10:33 pm

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:12:52 -0700, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

>In article < tmv083deenrds22lk9v1
p1bvseo486qoi2@4ax.com>,
> Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
>I'll grant that you're an expert on shit, seeing as how that's what
>you're made of, but that doesn't mean that you know shit about cell
>phones.
>
>You're just jealous because even though a child can use one intuitively,
>you're too stupid to figure it out.

You wish. I just think it's funny as HELL to see everyone wetting
their pants over a piece of shit PHONE that NO ONE has yet put their
hands on. Do you think you could hold the grandstanding to a minimum
until you actually have real life experience with the thing, or is
your life *THAT* empty???

Jolly Roger

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

On 2007-06-25 22:26:42 -0500, Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> said:

> I just think it's funny as HELL to see everyone wetting
> their pants over a piece of shit PHONE that NO ONE has yet put their
> hands on.

You've already decided it's a piece of shit without having ever put
your hands on one. Hypocrite lately?

--
JR

Michelle Steiner

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

In article < cn118396f9t98kt0mai9
pq62n1ea681diq@4ax.com>,
Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> You wish. I just think it's funny as HELL to see everyone wetting
> their pants over a piece of shit PHONE that NO ONE has yet put their
> hands on.

You've been shitting about it more than anyone has been wetting their
pants about it.

> Do you think you could hold the grandstanding to a minimum until you
> actually have real life experience with the thing, or is your life
> *THAT* empty???

Exactly where and when have I been grandstanding about it? If anyone
around here has been grandstanding and going apeshit, that person is
you. The majority of the rest of us, including some of the nay-sayers,
have been reasonable about it.

But I guess it's OK for people with empty lives, like you, to go
ballistic about just about anything, right?

--
Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.

Screw the iPhone

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:35:21 -0500, Jolly Roger
<jollyroger@R.E.M.O.V.E.pobox.com> wrote:

>On 2007-06-25 22:26:42 -0500, Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> said:
>
>
>You've already decided it's a piece of shit without having ever put
>your hands on one. Hypocrite lately?

Many here (especially the spam whores) have decided it's the greatest
thing since sliced bread without putting their hands on it yet. So
before you talk about hypocrisy, look around this group.

Screw the iPhone

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:52:00 -0700, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

>In article < cn118396f9t98kt0mai9
pq62n1ea681diq@4ax.com>,
> Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
>You've been shitting about it more than anyone has been wetting their
>pants about it.
>
>
>Exactly where and when have I been grandstanding about it? If anyone
>around here has been grandstanding and going apeshit, that person is
>you. The majority of the rest of us, including some of the nay-sayers,
>have been reasonable about it.
>
>But I guess it's OK for people with empty lives, like you, to go
>ballistic about just about anything, right?

Aww, does it really make you *that* uncomfortable when someone doesn't
get as big of a boner as you about a stupid XXX phone THAT HASN'T EVEN
BEEN RELEASED YET??? I could understand it if it were next week and
we were reading *real* reports from *real* people about their *real*
experiences with the i(diot)Phone. But, it's not, and all else is
conjecture until it happens. Now, go back to creaming your jeans
waiting for your i(diot)Phone.

Ura Dippschit

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

Ura Dippschit

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

In article < ci5183hr8s6n0dgqrs6d
k83298reei0g3t@4ax.com>,
Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> Aww, does it really make you *that* uncomfortable when someone doesn't
> get as big of a boner as you about a stupid XXX phone THAT HASN'T EVEN
> BEEN RELEASED YET??? I could understand it if it were next week and
> we were reading *real* reports from *real* people about their *real*
> experiences with the i(diot)Phone. But, it's not, and all else is
> conjecture until it happens. Now, go back to creaming your jeans
> waiting for your i(diot)Phone.

Ahahahah...typical talk from a future customer. We'll see who the idiot
is when you're still holding out because of all the shit you talk.

MuahMan

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

"Ura Dippschit" <URN.Idiot@idiots.com> wrote in message
news:URN.Idiot-5A11EE.22113925062007@news.verizon.net...
> In article < ci5183hr8s6n0dgqrs6d
k83298reei0g3t@4ax.com>,
> Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
> Ahahahah...typical talk from a future customer. We'll see who the idiot
> is when you're still holding out because of all the shit you talk.

I know sure as XXXX can't live without a third mp3 player. Especially one
with so much storage and expandable as well!

Michelle Steiner

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

In article < ci5183hr8s6n0dgqrs6d
k83298reei0g3t@4ax.com>,
Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> I could understand it if it were next week and we were reading *real*
> reports from *real* people about their *real* experiences with the
> i(diot)Phone. But, it's not, and all else is conjecture until it
> happens. Now, go back to creaming your jeans waiting for your
> i(diot)Phone.

Yeah, you're anti-iPhone hysteria is all conjecture too, but it is a
conjecture that goes against Apple's track record. On the other hand,
the pro-iPhone conjectures are supported by Apple's track record.

--
Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:06:16 -0700, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

>In article < ci5183hr8s6n0dgqrs6d
k83298reei0g3t@4ax.com>,
> Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
>Yeah, you're anti-iPhone hysteria is all conjecture too, but it is a
>conjecture that goes against Apple's track record. On the other hand,
>the pro-iPhone conjectures are supported by Apple's track record.

Much like a neutered dog, you just don't get it, do you? I'm always
skeptical over something that generates this much faux "buzz" when two
major companies are involved. Add to that the i(diot)Phone is being
advertised with features I'll never use. It's a PHONE, goddammit.
All I need a PHONE to do is make and receive PHONE CALLS, not watch
stupid YouTube videos or listen to music. That's what computers and
CD players are for. At least if one of those craps out, I still have
the functionality of the other devices. You Kool-aid drinking
lemmings who want to be the de facto guinea pig beta testers for
Crapple and Stinkular are candidates for psychological experiments in
mass mind control (read: cults). All the "hysteria" that you claim is
coming from the i(diot)Phone lemmings. Look at the posts here. But
you go and get your precious i(diot)Phone. And the first post you
make here bitching about it, expect me to jump all over it. Go ahead,
I'll be waiting...

Michelle Steiner

2007-06-26, 4:33 am

In article < t9b183dk8gn76qiqg2l5
pbf0lubdos1qaq@4ax.com>,
Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

>
> Much like a neutered dog, you just don't get it, do you?

Much like a rabid dog, you make mindless attacks.

> I'm always skeptical over something that generates this much faux
> "buzz" when two major companies are involved.

You're not skeptical, you're on the attack, pretending that your biased
and baseless opinion is fact.

> Add to that the i(diot)Phone is being advertised with features I'll
> never use.

The idiot is you, not the phone. Just because *you* will never use
those features doesn't mean that no one else will use them. If the
phone doesn't fit your needs and wants, don't buy it. What is so
XXXXing hard to understand about that?

Got a clue for you: the world doesn't revolve around you--it really
doesn't.

> All I need a PHONE to do is make and receive PHONE CALLS, not watch
> stupid YouTube videos or listen to music. That's what computers and
> CD players are for.

So you would rather carry three items than one item? Well, I'm not a
big strong, brainless musclebound he man like you; I'd rather carry just
one thing that does all of those functions.

> You Kool-aid drinking lemmings who want to be the de facto guinea pig
> beta testers for Crapple and Stinkular are candidates for
> psychological experiments in mass mind control (read: cults).

Yeah, right; anyone who doesn't think like you is a lemming. Last time
I looked, you're not Big Brother.

> All the "hysteria" that you claim is coming from the i(diot)Phone
> lemmings. Look at the posts here.

I have, and I see you and two or three (at most) other anti-Apple
ideologues ranting and raving like rabid dogs barking at the full moon.

> And the first post you make here bitching about it, expect me to jump
> all over it. Go ahead, I'll be waiting...

I strongly doubt that there will be anything to XXXXX about. But you
please keep howling, Fido; you're still good for a few laughs.

--
Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.

Ura Dippschit

2007-06-26, 12:33 pm

In article < t9b183dk8gn76qiqg2l5
pbf0lubdos1qaq@4ax.com>,
Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> It's a PHONE, goddammit.

No it's NOT, goddammit. Since you are too XXXXing dense to know WHAT it
actually is, maybe it's time you shut the XXXX up!

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-26, 3:33 pm

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:33:18 GMT, Ura Dippschit <URN.Idiot@idiots.com>
wrote:

>In article < t9b183dk8gn76qiqg2l5
pbf0lubdos1qaq@4ax.com>,
> Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
>No it's NOT, goddammit. Since you are too XXXXing dense to know WHAT it
>actually is, maybe it's time you shut the XXXX up!

Says the lemming. It's a phone, which is why it's being sold by a
PHONE COMPANY for use with a PHONE COMPANY'S service. Get it? Good.
Next.

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-26, 3:33 pm

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:05:47 -0700, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

>In article < t9b183dk8gn76qiqg2l5
pbf0lubdos1qaq@4ax.com>,
> Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
>Much like a rabid dog, you make mindless attacks.

I'm so sorry, it appears you are on the rag. That must explain why
you are so touchy when someone disagrees with your rose colored view
of stupid XXX PHONE. Damn, you are one sad little person.

>
>You're not skeptical, you're on the attack, pretending that your biased
>and baseless opinion is fact.

You have no facts to back up anything being said about the
i(diot)Phone other than what the suits at Crapple want you to know.
The sales staff has clearly done their job. Jim Jones offers you
Kool-aid and you ask for more. What an IDIOT you are.

>
>The idiot is you, not the phone. Just because *you* will never use
>those features doesn't mean that no one else will use them. If the
>phone doesn't fit your needs and wants, don't buy it. What is so
>XXXXing hard to understand about that?

What is so hard for you to understand it's a XXXXing PHONE, for gods
sake!?!? Anyone who feels they *need* the i(diot)Phone is sorely
lacking in the self-respect department.

>Got a clue for you: the world doesn't revolve around you--it really
>doesn't.

Really? I'd imagine most people who didn't drink the Kool-aid feels
the same way I do bout the i(diot)Phone. An overpriced, overhyped
piece of junk. Didn't I read somewhere the battery wasn't user
changeable? XXXX, if people who buy something like that aren't the
most stupid pieces of shit in the history of mankind.

>
>So you would rather carry three items than one item? Well, I'm not a
>big strong, brainless musclebound he man like you; I'd rather carry just
>one thing that does all of those functions.

If you have to carry that much shit around just to keep you
entertained, your problems go much deeper than any "PHONE" can
resolve. Please mention this to your psychiatrist on your next visit
so he can adjust you meds.

>
>Yeah, right; anyone who doesn't think like you is a lemming. Last time
>I looked, you're not Big Brother.

And I never pretended to be. You're just pissed because I'm not
wetting my pants over a goddamn PHONE, like you are. Damn, you're
pathetic.

>
>I have, and I see you and two or three (at most) other anti-Apple
>ideologues ranting and raving like rabid dogs barking at the full moon.

Then you aren't looking hard enough. I figure most are just biting
their tongues waiting for all the faux hysteria to calm down, Ms.
Astroturf. Quite frankly, just about all of the English speaking
world has heard of the i(diot)Phone by now, and they don't need
constant reminders and faux testimonials of how great it is BEFORE THE
XXXXING THING IS EVEN RELEASED!!!

>
>I strongly doubt that there will be anything to XXXXX about. But you
>please keep howling, Fido; you're still good for a few laughs.

Now you'll have to sit in your shanty and cry to yourself about your
bad decision to buy an i(diot)Phone because you'll be too afraid of
being told "I told you so" to complain here.

MuahMan

2007-06-26, 3:33 pm

"Screw the i (diot) Phone" <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote in message
news:h2j283d298o0fm9
09v5p4po8gmfvbdlpjt@
4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:33:18 GMT, Ura Dippschit <URN.Idiot@idiots.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Says the lemming. It's a phone, which is why it's being sold by a
> PHONE COMPANY for use with a PHONE COMPANY'S service. Get it? Good.
> Next.
>

Ura doesn't care what it is. He just know Steve Jobs told him he can't live
without one. So, he can't live without one.

Michelle Steiner

2007-06-26, 10:33 pm

In article < dcj283ho2ogj47h5bm02
ovo4qis0utq9j7@4ax.com>,
Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> I'm so sorry, it appears you are on the rag. That must explain why
> you are so touchy when someone disagrees with your rose colored view
> of stupid XXX PHONE. Damn, you are one sad little person.

The only opinion I've expressed is about you and your hypocrisy,
dogbreath; I haven't expressed any opinion about the phone itself, moron.

You, on the other hand, have been badmouthing the iPhone and Apple even
though you have had zero experience with the phone.

>
> You have no facts to back up anything being said about the
> i(diot)Phone other than what the suits at Crapple want you to know.

That is the reason that I haven't said anything about the phone itself.
You on the other hand, have absolutely no facts to back your baseless
and worthless attacks.

> What is so hard for you to understand it's a XXXXing PHONE, for gods
> sake!?!?

What makes you think that I don't understand that? Oh yes, your rabid
anti-Apple bigotry is what makes you think that.

> Anyone who feels they *need* the i(diot)Phone is sorely lacking in
> the self-respect department.

I didn't say anything about needing the phone, illiterate moron. Learn
to read for comprehension.

>
> Really? I'd imagine most people who didn't drink the Kool-aid feels
> the same way I do bout the i(diot)Phone

That's right; you imagine it, because you're too self-centered to accept
reality.

> An overpriced, overhyped piece of junk.

What evidence do you have that it is a piece of junk? Absolutely no
evidence at all. And "overpriced, overhyped" is merely your opinion.

>
> If you have to carry that much shit around just to keep you
> entertained, your problems go much deeper than any "PHONE" can
> resolve.

That's what you said that you do. I didn't say it.

>
> And I never pretended to be.

In this thread, you most certainly act as if you believe that you are.
I believe that you haven't pretended to be him, but only because you act
as if you believe that you are him.

> Now you'll have to sit in your shanty and cry to yourself about your
> bad decision to buy an i(diot)Phone because you'll be too afraid of
> being told "I told you so" to complain here.

I don't know where your "here" is, but it certainly isn't my "here".

But the bottom line is that you are a liar and a hypocrite with
delusions of adequacy, so just XXXX off.

--
Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.

Rod Speed

2007-06-26, 10:33 pm

Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote

> Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote

[color=darkred]
> The only opinion I've expressed is about you and your hypocrisy,
> dogbreath; I haven't expressed any opinion about the phone itself,

Bare faced lie.

> moron.

Wota stunningly rational line of argument you have there, child.

> You, on the other hand, have been badmouthing the iPhone and
> Apple even though you have had zero experience with the phone.

You in spades.

[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
> That is the reason that I haven't said anything about the phone itself.

Bare faced lie.

> You on the other hand, have absolutely no facts
> to back your baseless and worthless attacks.

You two make a good pair then.

None of the rest of your juvenile rant worth bothering with, all flushed where it belongs.

George Kerby

2007-06-26, 10:33 pm

On 6/26/07 4:19 PM, in article
michelle-CCC585.14191226062007@news.east.cox.net, "Michelle Steiner"
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> In article < dcj283ho2ogj47h5bm02
ovo4qis0utq9j7@4ax.com>,
> Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
> The only opinion I've expressed is about you and your hypocrisy,
> dogbreath; I haven't expressed any opinion about the phone itself, moron.
>
Don't insult my German Shepherd.

His breath doesn't smell of reeking shit like this XXXXXXX.

John C. Randolph

2007-06-26, 10:33 pm

On 2007-06-25 19:52:04 -0700, Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> said:

> On 26 Jun 2007 02:42:55 -0000, meagan34@gmail.com (Meg) wrote:
>
>
> I'm gonna laugh my XXX off when you whiney little babies get your
> precious i(diot)Phones and discover what a horrible piece of shit it
> actually is.
>
> HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!

Say there, prat: have you considered growing up and getting a life?
You really don't have to be this way, you know.

-jcr

Lars Träger

2007-06-27, 10:33 pm

Ura Dippschit <URN.Idiot@idiots.com> wrote:

> In article < cn118396f9t98kt0mai9
pq62n1ea681diq@4ax.com>,
> Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah. It's going to work different than all the videos and demos we've
> seen once we actually have one, right shit brain?

Well, I'd hope the displayed time isn't always 9:42 ...
--
Lars T.

Kurt Ullman

2007-06-27, 10:33 pm

In article <1i0e3mr. 1xdnrkh1b4g8y2N%Lars
.Traeger@epost.de>,
Lars.Traeger@epost.de (Lars Träger) wrote:

> Ura Dippschit <URN.Idiot@idiots.com> wrote:
>
>
> Well, I'd hope the displayed time isn't always 9:42 ...

Heck they already have it so more than one person can call. What do
you want? Blood?

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-27, 10:33 pm

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:19:12 -0700, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

>In article < dcj283ho2ogj47h5bm02
ovo4qis0utq9j7@4ax.com>,
> Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
>The only opinion I've expressed is about you and your hypocrisy,
>dogbreath; I haven't expressed any opinion about the phone itself, moron.

Bullshit, you cow. For example, you said it would supplant the iPod's
UI on the day of its release.

>You, on the other hand, have been badmouthing the iPhone and Apple even
>though you have had zero experience with the phone.

I'm badmouthing it based on what is known now. A non-removable
battery? A non-removable SIM card? Are you XXXXing serious? I'm
also taking shots at EVERYONE who has "got to have this phone the day
its released" without any real user experiences. What you see as
baseless criticism is really a condemnation of all the hype based
solely on what Crapple's and Stinkular's marketing departments have
released thus far. Go back to chewing your cud, cow.

>
>That is the reason that I haven't said anything about the phone itself.
>You on the other hand, have absolutely no facts to back your baseless
>and worthless attacks.

See above, liar. I could find other examples you've forgotten, but
you aren't worth the effort, cow.

>
>What makes you think that I don't understand that? Oh yes, your rabid
>anti-Apple bigotry is what makes you think that.

Your continued defense of it non-phone functions, that's what, cow.

>
>I didn't say anything about needing the phone, illiterate moron. Learn
>to read for comprehension.

What part of the word 'anyone' do you not understand, cow?

>
>That's right; you imagine it, because you're too self-centered to accept
>reality.

Try 'I'm too centered in reality to go all ga-ga over a stupid XXX
PHONE!'

>
>What evidence do you have that it is a piece of junk? Absolutely no
>evidence at all. And "overpriced, overhyped" is merely your opinion.

It has two names on it, Crapple, and worse, Stinkular. My long
experience with the cellular industry has shown me that a device's
worthiness is often inversely proportionate to its pre-market hype.

>
>That's what you said that you do. I didn't say it.

No, I never said I do. Please take a course in reading comprehension,
you stupid fat cow. When I'm listening to music, the phone can go to
hell. Same when I'm on a computer, the rest isn't necessary. You are
probably one of those big XXX bitches who listens to an MP3 player
while talking on the phone and putting on makeup and cramming a Big
Mac in your fat face while driving your big XXX SUV down the road.

>
>In this thread, you most certainly act as if you believe that you are.
>I believe that you haven't pretended to be him, but only because you act
>as if you believe that you are him.

Again, the reading comprehension bites your big XXX. Do you even know
what the term "Big Brother" actually means? I didn't think so. See
above, you dumb cow.

>
>I don't know where your "here" is, but it certainly isn't my "here".
>
>But the bottom line is that you are a liar and a hypocrite with
>delusions of adequacy, so just XXXX off.

We'll find out who the liar and hypocrite is when you buy your dumbass
i(diot)Phone and have buyers regret within six months. I think it's
funny as hell!!

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-27, 10:33 pm

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:20:23 -0500, George Kerby
< ghost_topper@hotmail
.com> wrote:

>
>On 6/26/07 4:19 PM, in article
>michelle-CCC585.14191226062007@news.east.cox.net, "Michelle Steiner"
><michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
>
>Don't insult my German Shepherd.
>
>His breath doesn't smell of reeking shit like this XXXXXXX.

You seem awfully familiar with the smell of your dog's breath and
feces. Does the ASPCA know what you are up to?

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-27, 10:33 pm

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:13:52 -0400, "MuahMan" <muahman@aol.com> wrote:

>
>"Screw the i (diot) Phone" <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote in message
> news:h2j283d298o0fm9
09v5p4po8gmfvbdlpjt@
4ax.com...
>
>
>Ura doesn't care what it is. He just know Steve Jobs told him he can't live
>without one. So, he can't live without one.

What is he, retarded?

MuahMan

2007-06-27, 10:33 pm

"Screw the i (diot) Phone" <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote in message
news:j86683l59doa09s
pu2bdv637clbot1ud67@
4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:13:52 -0400, "MuahMan" <muahman@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> What is he, retarded?
>

He's mactarded.

Michelle Steiner

2007-06-28, 4:33 am

In article < vl6683dghugijr49trlh
1ai7e07h1n1lkn@4ax.com>,
Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> You are probably one of those big XXX bitches who listens to an MP3
> player while talking on the phone and putting on makeup and cramming
> a Big Mac in your fat face while driving your big XXX SUV down the
> road.

Wrong again, dogbreath; I am not your mother.

You are a turd. You have always been a turd. You will always be a turd.

--
Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-28, 4:33 am

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:27:42 -0700, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

>In article < vl6683dghugijr49trlh
1ai7e07h1n1lkn@4ax.com>,
> Screw the i(diot)Phone <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>
>Wrong again, dogbreath; I am not your mother.
>
>You are a turd. You have always been a turd. You will always be a turd.

Mooo! Mooo! Mooo! Tell me, when you get your i(diot)Phone, are you
going to load up the contact list with the numbers of every takeout
joint in town? Mooo! Mooo! Get on back to the barn, Bessie, it's
milkin' time!

BTW, your followup trick didn't work. I'm no novice, you dumb cow.

George Kerby

2007-06-28, 10:33 am

On 6/27/07 9:21 PM, in article jv5683hruo2vfvovh2rk
iiet9ve5ccgdt1@4ax.com,
"Screw the iPhone (diot)" <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:20:23 -0500, George Kerby
> < ghost_topper@hotmail
.com> wrote:
>
>
> You seem awfully familiar with the smell of your dog's breath and
> feces. Does the ASPCA know what you are up to?
>
XXXX off Zero.

<ding>

(Watch this folks)

Screw the i(diot)Phone

2007-06-28, 3:33 pm

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:06:36 -0500, George Kerby
< ghost_topper@hotmail
.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>On 6/27/07 9:21 PM, in article jv5683hruo2vfvovh2rk
iiet9ve5ccgdt1@4ax.com,
>"Screw the iPhone (diot)" <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:
>
>XXXX off Zero.
>
><ding>
>
>
>(Watch this folks)

Watch what? You blow your dog while talking on your i(diot)Phone? Or
is Michelle going to show us her "extra" equipment? <shudder>

George Kerby

2007-06-28, 10:33 pm

On 6/28/07 1:55 PM, in article uv08835q80nv22r382iq
8c04vre2s5k6u7@4ax.com,
"Screw the iPhone (diot)" <apple@sucks.XXX> wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:06:36 -0500, George Kerby
> < ghost_topper@hotmail
.com> wrote:
>
>
> Watch what? You blow your dog while talking on your i(diot)Phone? Or
> is Michelle going to show us her "extra" equipment? <shudder>
>
Up yours, drooling canine!

<ding>

Here goes...

LinkBot