Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cingular cell phone service > June 2007 > Re: AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low car









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low car
John Fields

2007-06-28, 10:33 pm

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:38:01 -0700, Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Hi:
>
>Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question.
>
>I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation,
>carriers, and modulators.
>
>Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a
>frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles
>every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and
>an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose
>frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
>nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga-
>eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-
>power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
>power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond?
>
>If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why.
>
>10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an
>extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
>power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a
>nanosecond is shorter than a second.
>
>10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 cycles is an extremely
>large amount of cycles. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000
>gigacycles is even more because a gigacycle is more than a cycle.
>
>Giga-eon = a billion eons
>
>Eon = a billion years
>
>Gigacycle = a billion cycles.
>
>*nanocycle = billionth of a cycle
>
>Gigaphoton = a billion photons
>
>10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one
>large large number.
>
>10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000
>
>So you get:
>
>(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
>power-1,000,000,000)
>
>10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the-
>power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000)
>
>10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
>power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to-
>the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-
>to-the-power-1,000,000,000)]
>
>No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the
>jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am
>really interested in this.


---
No offense but all you're really interested in is getting
unsuspecting people with good hearts to respond to your inane
trolls.

It's painfully obvious that you're not even a neophyte when it comes
to science, so your persistence in wasting everyone's time with your
foolishness indicates that you're not looking for answers, only
attention.


--
JF
LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com