|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cingular cell phone service > July 2007 > Scott's reading comprehension? (was: Apple hits record success once again!)
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Scott's reading comprehension? (was: Apple hits record success once again!)
|
|
|
| Mitch <mi...@hawaii.rr> wrote:
> Scott <how...@you.do> wrote:
>
> Huh?
> It's in the third paragraph, the very first place the CEO is quoted.
Mitch,
I caught that too, and posted it yesterday with an opportunity for
Scott to admit that he made an honest mistake.
Perhaps Scott has "missed it" again, but since my post was only an
hour before he returned to the thread, its possible that it somehow
didn't get disseminated across USENET.
You know - - its how all of those "technology things" sometimes get
hung up in the ether. The same utterly simple stuff that people are
getting hung up over in regards to Apple sales vs. AT&T Activations.
> How could anyone expect iPhone to be mentioned above the two most
> critical lines of the company? Especially when it was sold for such a
> short time!
It doesn't matter. Scott has now his own subject line to test how bad
his reading comprehension is. If he misses it again, it would no
longer be a credible "accident", but is more likely that he's trying
to avoid that he was wrong by trying to ignore it. If that's the
case, it would only the 14th time that such a thing has ever happened
on USENET
-hh
| |
| Scott 2007-07-26, 10:33 pm |
| -hh < recscuba_google@hunt
zinger.com> wrote in
news:1185452239.184968.172600@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com:
> Mitch <mi...@hawaii.rr> wrote:
>
>
> Mitch,
>
> I caught that too, and posted it yesterday with an opportunity for
> Scott to admit that he made an honest mistake.
And I do admit an honest mistake- I missed the one-liner. Based on the
hype, both by Apple and it's zombies, I would have expected more.
>
> Perhaps Scott has "missed it" again, but since my post was only an
> hour before he returned to the thread, its possible that it somehow
> didn't get disseminated across USENET.
>
> You know - - its how all of those "technology things" sometimes get
> hung up in the ether. The same utterly simple stuff that people are
> getting hung up over in regards to Apple sales vs. AT&T Activations.
>
>
>
>
> It doesn't matter. Scott has now his own subject line to test how bad
> his reading comprehension is. If he misses it again, it would no
> longer be a credible "accident", but is more likely that he's trying
> to avoid that he was wrong by trying to ignore it.
I don't avoid admitting mistakes- the OP of this thread, however,
continues to live in fantasy land about his great knowledge base.
> If that's the
> case, it would only the 14th time that such a thing has ever happened
> on USENET
>
>
You obviously never read any of John Navas' stuff- he hits 14 times a
day by noon.
>
> -hh
>
>
|
|
|
|
|