| John Navas 2008-01-22, 3:33 pm |
| On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:03:39 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in < 4796133e$0$84220$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>Tinman wrote:
>
>
>Huh? I know he was posting a link to last year's article, it was true
>then and it's true now.
Except is was just spin then, and is still just spin now.
>
>LOL, so how many articles, repeating the same facts, do you think are
>required?
Spin, no matter how many times repeated, is still spin, not "facts".
The only real "facts" is that the only source is Verizon.
>
>No it isn't. ...
Saying so over and over doesn't make it true.
>Why do you find it surprising that Apple would have first approached the
>carrier that had been adding new subscribers at a far higher rate than
>its closest competitor, and that consistently is ranked as the highest
>quality carrier?
Because AT&T was clearly the stronger choice for Apple, with the largest
subscriber base and technology common to most of the rest of the world.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ>
|