|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Verizon wireless > December 2005 > Re: Verizon is best carrier for third year. In SF Bay Area, it's 1-Verizon, 2-T-Mobile, 3-Sprint, 4
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Verizon is best carrier for third year. In SF Bay Area, it's 1-Verizon, 2-T-Mobile, 3-Sprint, 4
|
|
|
|
"John Navas" < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote in message
news:RINlf.243387$zb5.225320@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>
> We'll just have to agree to disagree (as usual).
No we don't- you just need to provide some independent data to support your
opinions. Problem is, you won't find any.
>
>
> Nonsense.
Not nonsense at all- they alienated almost half of their new subscriber base
by charging additional unnecessary fees to have full network functionality
and coverage available to them. Their customer satisfaction numbers have
plummeted and their net adds pale in comparison to the competition. I
haven't looked at churn numbers, but I would expect to see the highest in
the industry.
Even with two different paltforms to service, I'd be willing to be that the
new Sprint has very few (if any) of these growing pains and shows a much
better pattern of customer satisfaction and synergy at the same point in
their merger. They are already showing much stronger finanacials.
>
>
>
> I did.
Where? In another newsgroup? You sure didn't do it here.
|
|
|
|
|