quote:

---

>I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

quote:

---

> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated
> by your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President
> who is trying to keep us safe from terrorists.

quote:

---

> In article <l7udnYwXE8mafF_fRVn-iA@comcast.com>,
> "Special Ed" <spled@dropout.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Anything intelligent you may have to contribute has yet to appear. And
> unlike smarmy ignorant knee-jerk bushbots, I know that Bush is not
> trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> If you grow up enough to be able to think for yourself, get back to us.
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

quote:

---

> I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>
> "The V710 phone hardware regardless of carrier software does not support
> the SPP (Serial Port Profile) or OBEX (Object Exchange) profile that
> most devices require to access the phonebook or transfer files. These
> features can not be added via a software upgrade. Particularly this is
> an issue when customers want to get their phonebook out of the phone and
> into their non-Motorola Bluetooth Car Kit. Our Motorola IHF1000 and OEM
> Telematics Bluetooth Car Kits allow access to the phonebook through the
> Bluetooth connection using the Motorola AT commands available to
> registered developers at www.motocoder.com."
>
> <https://motorola.custhelp.com/cgi-b...duser/std_adp.p
> hp?p_admin=1&p_userid=177& p_passwd=u8ZqM5YrTNB
haBbppUzEz/&p_faqid=4136&p_
> created=1092940495>
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/d5yd>
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

quote:

---

>I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>
> "The V710 phone hardware regardless of carrier software does not support
> the SPP (Serial Port Profile) or OBEX (Object Exchange) profile that
> most devices require to access the phonebook or transfer files. These
> features can not be added via a software upgrade. Particularly this is
> an issue when customers want to get their phonebook out of the phone and
> into their non-Motorola Bluetooth Car Kit. Our Motorola IHF1000 and OEM
> Telematics Bluetooth Car Kits allow access to the phonebook through the
> Bluetooth connection using the Motorola AT commands available to
> registered developers at www.motocoder.com."

quote:

---

> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

quote:

---

>
>
> Is there a point to this post? This has been known ever since the V710
> came out.

quote:

---

> In article <l7udnYwXE8mafF_fRVn-iA@comcast.com>,
> "Special Ed" <spled@dropout.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Anything intelligent you may have to contribute has yet to appear. And
> unlike smarmy ignorant knee-jerk bushbots, I know that Bush is not
> trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> If you grow up enough to be able to think for yourself, get back to us.

quote:

---

>
> Ya' know the Navy thought I was able to think well enough to command an
> F/A18 attack wing on numerous combat missions over Iraq and Kuwait. This
> was from an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf as part of Operation
> Desert Shield and Desert Storm where we were protecting even you and your
> ilk from harm. And yes I've been shot at and yes I've been hit.
>
> A simple apology to me an every other military person in the NG would be
> appropriate.
>

quote:

---

> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> news:michelle-EF0A57.10520429062005@news.west.cox.net...
>
> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by

quote:

---

> adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is trying

quote:

---

> keep us safe from terrorists.

quote:

---

>
> Ed
>
>

quote:

---

> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> news:michelle-EF0A57.10520429062005@news.west.cox.net...
>
> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by
> your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is
> trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> Ed
>

quote:

---

> "Special Ed" <spled@dropout.edu> wrote in message
> news:l7udnYwXE8mafF_
fRVn-iA@comcast.com...
>
> You are a retard.

quote:

---

> Now, Motorola is saying that it doesn't matter which carrier--the phone
> will never support OBEX, and no software upgrade can change that.

quote:

---

>
> Given that BT profiles are just software using the underlying BT RF
> hardware, I wonder how it can be that no software upgrade can change
> it?

quote:

---

>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
>news:michelle-EF0A57.10520429062005@news.west.cox.net...
>
>You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by your
>adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is trying to
>keep us safe from terrorists.
>
>Ed
>

quote:

---

> In article <skMwe.1535$0V3.1503@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> CharlesH <hoch@exemplary.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Well, there is either a valid reason or else Motorola is lying.
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

quote:

---

> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> news:michelle-EF0A57.10520429062005@news.west.cox.net...
>
>
>
> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by your
> adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is trying to
> keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> Ed
>
>

quote:

---

> It's all Bush's fault!
>
>
> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> news:michelle-40ABB8.00093830062005@news.west.cox.net...
>
>
>
>

quote:

---

> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> news:michelle-EF0A57.10520429062005@news.west.cox.net...
>
> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated
> by your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President
> who is trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> Ed

quote:

---

> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> news:michelle-341BB9.12031029062005@news.west.cox.net...
>
> Ya' know the Navy thought I was able to think well enough to command
> an F/A18 attack wing on numerous combat missions over Iraq and
> Kuwait. This was from an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf as part
> of Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm where we were protecting
> even you and your ilk from harm. And yes I've been shot at and yes
> I've been hit.
> A simple apology to me an every other military person in the NG would
> be appropriate.
>
> Ed

quote:

---

> Special Ed wrote:
>
>
> Shows how easy a jet is to fly. And yes I really can fly one.
>

quote:

---

> Special Ed wrote:
>
>
> Why would she want to support the most incompetent President in history?
>

quote:

---

> Special Ed wrote:
>
>
> Why would she want to support the most incompetent President in history?

quote:

---

> "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:11cigi1qjqhfs1e
@news.supernews.com...
>
> Real simple actually. Regardless of your opinion of his ability, he's the
> Commander in Chief and we're at war. That demands the support of every
> American--- you and that twit OP are Americans, aren't you?
>
>

quote:

---

>
> You obviously forgot about Jimmy Carter.....

quote:

---

>
> Real simple actually. Regardless of your opinion of his ability, he's
> the Commander in Chief and we're at war. That demands the support of
> every American--- you and that twit OP are Americans, aren't you?

quote:

---

> "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:11cigka7vlt4544
@news.supernews.com...
>
> But you clearly don't understand the difference between "flying a
> jet"-- which anyone with a 10th grade education can do-- and taking
> off/landing a high performance aircraft from a carrier, being in
> *combat* or *leading* a combat air wing.

quote:

---

> On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 07:05:51 -0700, John wrote:
>
>
> You obviously forgot about Jimmy Carter.....

quote:

---

>
>
> No I did remember him. Jimmy Carter has no experience getting the
> country into an unneccesary war that has cost over 1700 lives, 12000
> serious injuries and 135 BILLION a year.
>

quote:

---

> No I do understand it. Bush flew a jet and that PROVES it doesn't
> take a genius. And by the way I'll put my military experience up
> against yours ANYDAY.

quote:

---

> In article < 11cm2nq7llbmn81@news
.supernews.com>,
> "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> So will I.
>

quote:

---

>
> I would have to agree that Carter was less competent than Shrub; the
> problem is that if Bush were incompetent, he wouldn't be XXXXing up the
> nation as much as he is doing.
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

quote:

---

> "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:11cigi1qjqhfs1e
@news.supernews.com...
>
> Real simple actually. Regardless of your opinion of his ability, he's the
> Commander in Chief and we're at war. That demands the support of every
> American--- you and that twit OP are Americans, aren't you?

quote:

---

>
>
>
>

quote:

---

> Jimmy Carter wasn't President when some lunatic
> assholes flew airplanes into buildings.
>
> Apples to bananas.

quote:

---

>
> "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:11cm2rdcf2039fa
@news.supernews.com...
>
>

quote:

---

> As usual, you haven't got a clue. Nothing has changed...you can't
> quite figure out how come your precious dumbocrats lost AGAIN!!! I
> am quite happy with the direction our country is going.

quote:

---

> If you don't like it here, why don't you move to France. I am sure
> you would fit in there.

quote:

---

> Whether you support President Bush or not, we are all fortunate we
> live in a country where we have the freedom to voice either opinion
> without fear.

quote:

---

> If you'd like to continue this debate, it would be nice if you'd take
> it along with the vulgar language to a newsgroup that is more
> appropriate for such discussions. Thanks.

quote:

---

> I'd rather repair this nation, and save it from the miscreants, like
> you, who are destroying it.
>

quote:

---

>
>
> Bush and his cronies are XXXXing up the country, and all you care about
> is "vulgar language"?
>
> I'm not the one who started this debate; I'm merely responding to those
> who support our un-American president.
>

quote:

---

> Joseph E. Johnston wrote:

[vbcol=darkred]
>
>
> No I do understand it. Bush flew a jet and that PROVES it doesn't take a
> genius. And by the way I'll put my military experience up against yours
> ANYDAY.

quote:

---

> In article < 11cm2nq7llbmn81@news
.supernews.com>,
> "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
> So will I.
>

quote:

---

> "Michelle," you're really a guy, aren't you--- or maybe a guy wannabe?

quote:

---

>
> Gotta' tell you John-- the last time a guy offered to compare his
> with mine, I was in a locker room back in junior high school--- and
> by the way, he lost;-)

quote:

---

>
> Gotta' tell you John-- the last time a guy offered to compare his with mine,
> I was in a locker room back in junior high school--- and by the way, he
> lost;-)

quote:

---

>
> The last time I checked, we live in a democracy where we the people
> elect our government leaders. The candidate we favor may not always
> win. You obviously don't support Mr. Bush. You have that right and
> are free to express it.

quote:

---

> However, to include vulgar, offensive language simply highlights
> you're inability to articulate yourself with clear thoughts.

quote:

---

> What did the use of f****** add to your post?

quote:

---

> I would have had a much easier time with your comments had you been
> able to express them without using offensive language.

quote:

---

> When you call the President of the United States un-American, you
> insult everyone who believes in this country.

quote:

---

> If you believe Mr. Bush is acting in an unconstitutional manner, then
> act on your beliefs by contacting your state representatives and
> senators and ask them to investigate it and take appropriate action.

quote:

---

> If all you want to do is voice negative opinions which appear, to me,
> to be un-American, you have a choice.

quote:

---

> No one is forcing you to live in this country. If you really believe
> there is somewhere better to live, by all means please feel free to
> leave.

quote:

---

> You are really just too dense to understand that a majority of us
> like GW and his policies.

quote:

---

> Too bad you aren't one of them.

quote:

---

> Your precious Kerry lost and nothing will change that

quote:

---

> GW is doing just fine.

quote:

---

> Oh, btw, this country is not in need of saving.

quote:

---

>Many others are,

quote:

---

>but not this one.

quote:

---

> In article <18Sdna8TIb_7pVDfRVn-oA@comcast.com>,
> Kent McPherson <bigk@kentmcpherson.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yup; however, the point is that I started this thread with a message
> about the V710 and OBEX. Some jerk, who had nothing to contribute to
> the topic, flamed me because of my sig.
>
>
> Nope; it highlights the fact that I am totally and thoroughly disgusted
> with George W. Bush. Judicious use of "vulgar" language indicates an
> ability to know when such language is appropriate in conveying one's
> thoughts. Now, if I had peppered that word extensively throughout my
> speech (or used non-vulgar terms such as "y'know" in the same manner),
> you would definitely have a point.
>
>
> Emphasis. It is a much more potent word than "destroying," for instance.
>
>
> What is way more offensive than my language is what Bush is doing to
> this country.
>
>
> No I don't because Bush is not the country. Nor is government the
> country. He is supposed to be the leader of the country, but the only
> place he is leading the country to is ruin.
>
>
> A congress run by his party? That would be a futile effort indeed. If
> I thought he was acting in an unconstitutional manner, but I didn't say
> that I thought that. I said, in terms that you object to, that he is
> destroying the country.
>
>
> So, it is un-American to criticize the president? Maybe in the former
> USSR, Communist China, Cuba, Pinochet's Chile, etc., it might be an
> offense to criticize the leaders of the country, but in the United
> States, it is not only a right, but it is a duty.
>
> "To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
> we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
> and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
> --Teddy Roosevelt
>
>
> I thought that went out with Joe McCarthy. No, not you, nor anyone
> else, is going to chase me out of my country. The country is broken,
> and I want to help fix it.
>
> "My country, right or wrong: if right, to be kept right; and if wrong,
> to be set right."
> Senator Carl Schurz of Missouri, 1899
>
> And on a final note:
>
> If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know
> you're not living in a free society.
> Kim Campbell - former Prime Minister of Canada
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

quote:

---

>
> "Special Ed" <spled@dropout.edu> wrote in message
> news:l7udnYwXE8mafF_
fRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> your
> to
>
> You know, anything intelligent that you may have to contribute is negated
> by
> your adolescent reply. Grow up, child. At least for the time being,
> people
> are allowed to have differing political views. Disagreeing with yours
> doesn't make one immature. Stamping one's feet and calling people names
> because you disagree with their politics, on the the other hand, does.
>
>
>
>
>

quote:

---

> Special Ed wrote:
>
>
> Why would she want to support the most incompetent President in history?
>
>

quote:

---

> You forget the most important thing. All this is your opinion. Oh,
> you have company, but at the last election the other side thankfully
> had a few million more on their side.

quote:

---

> It tells us a lot about you that you cannot simply say I do not agree
> with x, y, and z that Bush is doing and leave it at that.

quote:

---

> He's an idiot and worse is the way you start your discussion.

quote:

---

> A little understanding for the slightest (call it 1/10th of one
> percent) chance that what's he's doing may be the right thing might
> just give you the maturity necessary to say "hey I didnt vote for
> him, I dont agree with him, but for the next for years he leads the
> country."

quote:

---

> I hope this isnt too hard to swallow.

quote:

---

> Michelle--Loved reading your responses, you owned the thread ~_^

quote:

---

>"John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:11cm2rdcf2039fa
@news.supernews.com...
>Jimmy Carter wasn't President when some lunatic
>assholes flew airplanes into buildings.
>
>Apples to bananas.

quote:

---

> Jimmy Carter was President when someone took over our embassy
> somewhere, and he was smart enough to sit it out rather than kill
> thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of innocent citizens
> of another country.

quote:

---

>In article <9edAe.67$dX5.5@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Tony Montano" <montanoa@snet.net> wrote:
>
>
>Please stop those sexual innuendos. (Or are you merely quoting what
>Clinton said to Lewinsky?)

quote:

---

>Funny, though, how so many people object to my calling for Bush's
>impeachment for his serious malfeasement in office, but were clamoring
>for Clinton's impeachment for letting Lewinsky felate him.
>
>Ditto for those who objected to my language but had no problems with
>Cheney saying "Go XXXX yourself" to a senator on the floor of the senate.

quote:

---

>
> [Um, Michelle, you're being overly sensitive with that one. Swallow
> is not always a sexual term and I didn't take it as one in this case.
> Remember, Freud said a sometimes a cigar is just a cigar (also not
> intended as a reference to the Lewinski situation (and BTW, *she* set
> out to seduce *him*, before she even left California for the intern
> job)).]

quote:

---

>In article < f87dd1hti1r8q7o6jafu
smh8dt14bqvnhm@4ax.com>,
> David S < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote:
>
>
>Actually, I was cracking a joke. Guess that it didn't go over very
>well, huh?

quote:

---

>In article < cf1dd1tke5f9hjg32l79
fgh6hk5ki5m1ak@4ax.com>,
> David S < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote:
>
>
>Not quite; there was a rescue attempt that failed, partially because
>Carter and his administration tried to micro manage it, and partially
>for technological reasons.

quote:

---

>
> Which killed.... I forget, half a dozen Americans? A dozen? Two
> dozen? Whatever, it's a big difference.

quote:

---

> In article < mp2gd1hd5orq1oadbj3v
8tlf4lsemtvim1@4ax.com>,
> David S < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote:
>
>
> There would have been a lot more deaths had the mission not failed as it
> had, and who knows what repercussions would have happened had they
> actually attempted the rescue?

quote:

---

>
> Oh the horror, use of force to rescue US citizens and public servants.

quote:

---

> In article <0zDCe.433$6f.108@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Thomas M. Goethe" <spam@spam.com> wrote:
>
>
> I didn't say they shouldn't have made the attempt; I was saying that
> they should have known what they were doing. Had the made the attempt,
> and it failed, what would have happened to the hostages.
>
> If it were going to fail, it was better to have failed at the outset as
> it did than during the rescue itself.
>