|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Verizon wireless > November 2006 > Re: U.S.Copyright Office(larry/scott)
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: U.S.Copyright Office(larry/scott)
|
|
| putt@webtv.net 2006-11-29, 10:33 am |
| >Not quite true. The ruling speaks to the
> locking of a phone to a specific carrier.
> It specifically mentions that unlocking
> 'crippled' features on the phone is not a
> part of the ruling.
I did not write the article for USAToday. The article came out on the
day I made the post and I posted as it was written. Instead of
vilifying me and my attempt to help inform.....read the article, then
inform the Editor of the paper how much misinformation was contained in
that article? It was in the Tech section of the Nov 24th edition.
Dave S(Texas)
| |
|
| putt@webtv.net wrote in news:7014-456D8FC0-11@storefull-3273.bay.webtv.net:
>
> I did not write the article for USAToday. The article came out on the
> day I made the post and I posted as it was written. Instead of
> vilifying me and my attempt to help inform.....read the article, then
> inform the Editor of the paper how much misinformation was contained in
> that article? It was in the Tech section of the Nov 24th edition.
>
> Dave S(Texas)
>
>
Villify? Please point out where I attempted anything other than correcting
the information contained in a post in a Usenet newsgroup. In fact, I
never directed a single comment towards you- that would be apparent by the
lack of the word "you" in the previous post. Please focus your feelings of
persecution on those that actually commit it.
|
|
|
|
|