|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Verizon wireless > February 2006 > questions for violet
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
questions for violet
|
|
| David S 2006-02-19, 11:48 pm |
| You seem to be a vzw employee, so let me ask you:
I just took my NE2 and renewed my contract for another 2 years in November.
I have AC-I 400, but I rarely use more than 100 minutes. Now I am thinking
of switching to a Family Share plan.
1. Will this cause my contract to reset to 2 years from the date I switch?
2. Will I be forced to switch my own phone to AC-II? I'll understand if the
new one has to be on AC-II, but I want to keep mine on AC-I for now.
3. WHY will they force me to bump up to 700 minutes? As I said, I barely
use 100, and with the second person I still doubt we'd use more than 300.
Note that this won't cost me a mere $10 a month or even $20, but _$30_ per
month more than I pay now.
--
David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
"Always go to the top, Radar." - Col. Potter
"You're closer to it than me, sir." - Radar
| |
| Special Ed 2006-02-19, 11:48 pm |
| "David S" < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote in message
news:dgehv11oktrjb3t
ol7umes5mg1vg6d8dhs@
4ax.com...
> You seem to be a vzw employee, so let me ask you:
>
> I just took my NE2 and renewed my contract for another 2 years in
> November.
> I have AC-I 400, but I rarely use more than 100 minutes. Now I am thinking
> of switching to a Family Share plan.
>
> 1. Will this cause my contract to reset to 2 years from the date I switch?
>
> 2. Will I be forced to switch my own phone to AC-II? I'll understand if
> the
> new one has to be on AC-II, but I want to keep mine on AC-I for now.
>
> 3. WHY will they force me to bump up to 700 minutes? As I said, I barely
> use 100, and with the second person I still doubt we'd use more than 300.
> Note that this won't cost me a mere $10 a month or even $20, but _$30_ per
> month more than I pay now.
>
> --
> David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
> http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
> Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
> Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
> "Always go to the top, Radar." - Col. Potter
> "You're closer to it than me, sir." - Radar
>
Would you like some cheese with that whine?
Edw.
| |
| Ben Skversky 2006-02-19, 11:48 pm |
| T-mobile pre paid. The cost is .10 a minute. One thousand minutes is $100
for the year.
"David S" < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote in message
news:dgehv11oktrjb3t
ol7umes5mg1vg6d8dhs@
4ax.com...
> You seem to be a vzw employee, so let me ask you:
>
> I just took my NE2 and renewed my contract for another 2 years in
> November.
> I have AC-I 400, but I rarely use more than 100 minutes. Now I am thinking
> of switching to a Family Share plan.
>
> 1. Will this cause my contract to reset to 2 years from the date I switch?
>
> 2. Will I be forced to switch my own phone to AC-II? I'll understand if
> the
> new one has to be on AC-II, but I want to keep mine on AC-I for now.
>
> 3. WHY will they force me to bump up to 700 minutes? As I said, I barely
> use 100, and with the second person I still doubt we'd use more than 300.
> Note that this won't cost me a mere $10 a month or even $20, but _$30_ per
> month more than I pay now.
>
> --
> David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
> http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
> Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
> Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
> "Always go to the top, Radar." - Col. Potter
> "You're closer to it than me, sir." - Radar
>
| |
|
| Good point Ben, I guess it boils down to where you want to use the phone. At
100 minutes/month you can't be using it in that many places.
"Ben Skversky" <bskversky1@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:r_8Kf.13475$dO2.9881@trnddc07...
> T-mobile pre paid. The cost is .10 a minute. One thousand minutes is $100
> for the year.
>
>
> "David S" < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote in message
> news:dgehv11oktrjb3t
ol7umes5mg1vg6d8dhs@
4ax.com...
>
>
| |
| David S 2006-02-23, 5:48 pm |
| On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:14:16 GMT, "user" <user@unknown.com> chose to add
this to the great equation of life, the universe, and everything:
>Good point Ben, I guess it boils down to where you want to use the phone. At
>100 minutes/month you can't be using it in that many places.
With VZW, I have signal almost everywhere I go. I just don't have that much
to say on the phone. The second phone would be used primarily on the far
north side of Chicago, right at the lakefront. Anybody know how good T-Mo's
signal is there?
--
David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
"I could end up being the music industry's worst nightmare: a smart gal
with a fat bank account who is unafraid to go down in flames fighting for a
principle." - Courtney Love, in the Los Angeles Times, on her legal fight
against Universal Music Group challenging the business practices of major
record labels
|
|
|
|
|