Cellular forums Home > Archive > Verizon wireless > February 2006 > questions for violet









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author questions for violet
David S

2006-02-19, 11:48 pm

You seem to be a vzw employee, so let me ask you:

I just took my NE2 and renewed my contract for another 2 years in November.
I have AC-I 400, but I rarely use more than 100 minutes. Now I am thinking
of switching to a Family Share plan.

1. Will this cause my contract to reset to 2 years from the date I switch?

2. Will I be forced to switch my own phone to AC-II? I'll understand if the
new one has to be on AC-II, but I want to keep mine on AC-I for now.

3. WHY will they force me to bump up to 700 minutes? As I said, I barely
use 100, and with the second person I still doubt we'd use more than 300.
Note that this won't cost me a mere $10 a month or even $20, but _$30_ per
month more than I pay now.

--
David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
"Always go to the top, Radar." - Col. Potter
"You're closer to it than me, sir." - Radar

Special Ed

2006-02-19, 11:48 pm

"David S" < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote in message
news:dgehv11oktrjb3t
ol7umes5mg1vg6d8dhs@
4ax.com...
> You seem to be a vzw employee, so let me ask you:
>
> I just took my NE2 and renewed my contract for another 2 years in
> November.
> I have AC-I 400, but I rarely use more than 100 minutes. Now I am thinking
> of switching to a Family Share plan.
>
> 1. Will this cause my contract to reset to 2 years from the date I switch?
>
> 2. Will I be forced to switch my own phone to AC-II? I'll understand if
> the
> new one has to be on AC-II, but I want to keep mine on AC-I for now.
>
> 3. WHY will they force me to bump up to 700 minutes? As I said, I barely
> use 100, and with the second person I still doubt we'd use more than 300.
> Note that this won't cost me a mere $10 a month or even $20, but _$30_ per
> month more than I pay now.
>
> --
> David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
> http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
> Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
> Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
> "Always go to the top, Radar." - Col. Potter
> "You're closer to it than me, sir." - Radar
>


Would you like some cheese with that whine?

Edw.


Ben Skversky

2006-02-19, 11:48 pm

T-mobile pre paid. The cost is .10 a minute. One thousand minutes is $100
for the year.


"David S" < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote in message
news:dgehv11oktrjb3t
ol7umes5mg1vg6d8dhs@
4ax.com...
> You seem to be a vzw employee, so let me ask you:
>
> I just took my NE2 and renewed my contract for another 2 years in
> November.
> I have AC-I 400, but I rarely use more than 100 minutes. Now I am thinking
> of switching to a Family Share plan.
>
> 1. Will this cause my contract to reset to 2 years from the date I switch?
>
> 2. Will I be forced to switch my own phone to AC-II? I'll understand if
> the
> new one has to be on AC-II, but I want to keep mine on AC-I for now.
>
> 3. WHY will they force me to bump up to 700 minutes? As I said, I barely
> use 100, and with the second person I still doubt we'd use more than 300.
> Note that this won't cost me a mere $10 a month or even $20, but _$30_ per
> month more than I pay now.
>
> --
> David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
> http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
> Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
> Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
> "Always go to the top, Radar." - Col. Potter
> "You're closer to it than me, sir." - Radar
>



user

2006-02-21, 11:48 pm

Good point Ben, I guess it boils down to where you want to use the phone. At
100 minutes/month you can't be using it in that many places.
"Ben Skversky" <bskversky1@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:r_8Kf.13475$dO2.9881@trnddc07...
> T-mobile pre paid. The cost is .10 a minute. One thousand minutes is $100
> for the year.
>
>
> "David S" < dwstreeter@spamisnau
ghty.att.net> wrote in message
> news:dgehv11oktrjb3t
ol7umes5mg1vg6d8dhs@
4ax.com...
>
>



David S

2006-02-23, 5:48 pm

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:14:16 GMT, "user" <user@unknown.com> chose to add
this to the great equation of life, the universe, and everything:

>Good point Ben, I guess it boils down to where you want to use the phone. At
>100 minutes/month you can't be using it in that many places.


With VZW, I have signal almost everywhere I go. I just don't have that much
to say on the phone. The second phone would be used primarily on the far
north side of Chicago, right at the lakefront. Anybody know how good T-Mo's
signal is there?

--
David Streeter, "a guy's guy" -- Dave Barry
http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
"I could end up being the music industry's worst nightmare: a smart gal
with a fat bank account who is unafraid to go down in flames fighting for a
principle." - Courtney Love, in the Los Angeles Times, on her legal fight
against Universal Music Group challenging the business practices of major
record labels

LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com