| Scott 2006-05-23, 11:48 pm |
|
"John Navas" < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote in message
news:1kGcg.90399$Fs1.75003@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> Only USA statisticians are credible? How droll!
Actualy, nothing you linked to was very credible. Most of it was not even
well written.
My attention to nationality was more to point out your inability to find any
american sources in the first two pages of the Google search performed to
retrieve the links you posted.
>
>
> The issue of non-response bias pertains to ACSI, the subject of this
> thread.
No, it doesn't.
> "Stay on target, Luke!"
Get a life, Spongebob.
>
> CU/CR suffers more from a different issue: non-random, self-seleted
> sample.
>
> Finally, any survey that lumps different technologies together (D-AMPS and
> GSM
> in the case of Cingular, CDMA and iDEN in the case of Sprint-Nextel) isn't
> a
> meaningful measure of either, since it's roughly comparable to saying the
> average person has one testicle.
Rubbish. You very flawed and uneducated opinion and logic would mean that
you could not compare surveys of Verizon and Cingular, due to the different
technologies involved. Nielson surveys would be totally irrelevent because
programming is not of the same format.
Do you have any sources to back up this juvenile claim of yours, or is this
simply more of your own uneducated drivel?
>
> That you don't acknowledge these real statistical issues makes your bias
> all
> the more apparent.
>
> --
> Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
|