| Scott 2006-05-23, 11:48 pm |
|
"John Navas" < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote in message
news:iGGcg.90461$Fs1.31863@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In < 446ccf92$0$96939$742
ec2ed@news.sonic.net> on Thu, 18 May 2006 12:48:33
> -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Not true. CU/CR suffers from non-random, self-selected sampling, plus low
> sample sizes when broken down. It also suffers from lumping different
> technologies together (D-AMPS and GSM in the case of Cingular, CDMA and
> iDEN
> in the case of Sprint-Nextel), which isn't a meaningful measure of either,
> since it's roughly comparable to saying the average person has one
> testicle.
Says who? You?
>
>
> Like Verizon.
And Cingular.
>
> Also not true. As a result of the ATTWS merger, Cingular now has arguably
> the
> best network in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Says who? You? No survey done to date backs up this laughable claim.
>
>
> Then, assuming you're not making that up too, your phone is either ancient
> or
> defective.
Or, the network sucks.
>
>
> More nonsense(tm). GSM sound quality is as good or better than CDMA.
Rubbish.
>
>
> More nonsense(tm). Radio Shack's problems, which actually began last year
> with Verizon, are due to its own poor management, as evidenced by its CEO
> scandal. Cingular is actually part of its solution, not the cause of its
> problems. That Radio Shack is continuing to struggle is no great
> surprise.
According to who? You?
>
> "John Navas is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -
> massive,
> difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
> boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
|