|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Verizon wireless > May 2006 > Re: Cingular Sues Sprint, claiming that their network is more "powerful"
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Cingular Sues Sprint, claiming that their network is more "powerful"
|
|
| Toggle 2006-05-27, 5:48 pm |
| Kenny-boy Lay and Skilling refused to engage in the knowledge necessary
to make decisions of that kind. If you carry the analogy a few steps
further and apply it to Cingular's ultimate owners and the decisions
they made, well, doesn't it make you feel more comfortable about
Sprint? And I'm speaking as someone who wants the best service from
the best company, not a rah-rah Sprint supporter. I'm just reading the
newspaper.
| |
|
| Toggle wrote:
> Kenny-boy Lay and Skilling refused to engage in the knowledge necessary
> to make decisions of that kind. If you carry the analogy a few steps
> further and apply it to Cingular's ultimate owners and the decisions
> they made, well, doesn't it make you feel more comfortable about
> Sprint? And I'm speaking as someone who wants the best service from
> the best company, not a rah-rah Sprint supporter. I'm just reading the
> newspaper.
Sprint's complaint to the BBB was reasonable. Cingular is running around
trumpeting "fewest dropped calls" with no indication of the methodology
used in the study, or the actual results. It's entirely possible that
the actual results are meaningless because they are so close, or because
the areas they evaluated are not representative of the whole country.
The fact that Cingular doesn't want to release the details means that
they are hiding something.
|
|
|
|
|