|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Verizon wireless > March 2007 > Niggers, The Failed Race
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Niggers, The Failed Race
|
|
| Cletis Perkins 2007-03-07, 4:33 am |
| Sorry, NIGGERS, but it's true: your race are a failed race because
you're a
feckless, unruly, uncivilized horde of feral proto-humans. You never
figured
out how to live in a society bigger than one or two squabbling
families.
Starting thousands of years ago, everyone else on this planet without
exception did - they invented religion, the idea of law, and the ideas
of
property and respect for the value of human life. This enabled tribes
to
coalesce into bigger groups and become organized. The rest is history,
or
rather civilization.
But your lot never did this, did they? Abstract thought and problem-
solving
have never been the black man's strengths, have they? Did they invent
a
long-lived and intellectually coherent religion? Nope. Did they ever
build a
city? Nope. Did they even invent bricks? Nope (the reason there's no
Stonehenge in Africa is because it took more than 20 people to move
the
slabs of rock - clearly a non-starter in Africa, where assembling more
than
20 niggers normally results in a war). Did they till the land? Nope.
Did
they domesticate an animal for their use? Nope. Did they invent a
written
language? Nope. Did they invent the wheel? Mainly, nope. Were they
curious
enough about what lay out across the sea to sail upon it? Nope.
And blacks are the only "humans" on this planet of which all this is
true.
Eskimos are more technically advanced than blacks were, despite the
handicap
of having no raw materials to work with other than dead fish and
snow.
Indians managed to domesticate the elephant. Why couldn't Negros?
So why do you fail everywhere even today? Let me offer a hypothesis.
It's
because feral behavior - innate savagery, murderous violence if
annoyed,
predisposition to rape many women and thus fecklessly father many
children -
conferred valuable survival advantages on individuals in the
backward,
Paleolithic milieu of Africa. But they don't help your kind in a
civilized
society. Unfortunately for the rest of us, the last few hundred years
have
not been long enough for these behaviors to have been domesticated out
of
you all. So you're all still at it.
Let me illustrate this for you by analogy. Technically, an American
pit bull
terrier and an English golden retriever are exactly the same species.
They
can produce offspring, if crossbred.
The former was bred to exhibit certain characteristics - wanton
aggression,
propensity to fight, physical strength, powerful bite, and so on. The
latter
was bred to retrieve birds shot and killed by its masters, and to do
this,
it has to have a docile, placid, unaggressive nature; otherwise it
would
treat what it found as its own kill and refuse to hand it over.
Now imagine that your small children, aged maybe two or three years
old, are
going to be locked in a room with five or six of those dogs, and the
dogs
haven't been fed for a week.
Which breed would you rather lock in there with *your* children?
Hungry pit
bulls, or hungry golden retrievers? Or do you figure that, even though
they
*look* differently, they're all the same species really, so of course
the
pit bulls certainly won't act any differently?
Exactly!
All this PC crap we hear spouted in the media about how "there's no
such
thing as race" is just that - crap. A dog has four legs and a tail; a
cat
also has four legs and a tail, but that doesn't make it a dog. The
superficial similarity between cats and dogs and between whites and
blacks
is just that - superficial. If there really were no genetic
difference
between niggers and humans, then presumably my white woman and I could
very
easily produce a black baby between us at any time, and any nigger and
his
ho a white one.
Whenever blacks achieve a certain critical mass numerically in a
pre-existing non-black society, they start to exhibit their natural
feral
behavior and to turn their environment back into a recognizably
African,
essentially Stone Age one. Thus, Africa has the jungle; black enclaves
have
"da 'hood." Native Africans were small wandering herds of marginal
animals,
one famine away from extinction, and which therefore fought each
other
savagely for pieces of territory. Large groups of African-Americans?
at
liberty in the west actually deliberately break themselves down into
*smaller*, tribal hordes, because they feel uneasy in and unaccustomed
to a
larger society. Negro gangs of twenty to fifty individuals assert
their
rights to tag?other peoples property through gang violence, but fail
to
co-operate otherwise.
For instance, a 15- or 20-strong horde of Negroes was recently filmed
by a
security camera inside a London bank they were robbing. Once they had
terrified the cashiers into handing over the money, they then fought
*each
other* for it, in the middle of the cashiers hall, like hyenas
fighting over
an antelope. Having stolen from the bank, they instantly started to
steal
from each other. The idea of escaping first, then sharing the swag,
was just
too complex for them to understand, never mind implement.
And so it goes on. You *cannot* fuse blacks into existing large
societies or
standalone nations because they are just plain not adapted to it. I'm
sorry
for you niggers and for your savagery, and I'm sorry you were born a
violent
black aboriginal savage in a civilized society, but I'm more sorry for
the
white societies that are having to tolerate all your crime while we
try to
absorb you.
This is why all black nations fail economically and sink into
corruption,
civil war, and permanent dependence on the white man's generosity.
And presumably this is also why you pathetically allowed yourselves to
be
enslaved: you're savage enough still to be angry about it long after
it
ended, but you were too backward to stop it at the time. No black
Spartacus,
is there? Why no slave uprisings among blacks? Slaves repeatedly rose
against the Romans even they knew they'd be crucified for it, when
captured.
*White* slaves, that is. They cared enough about their stolen liberty
that
they were prepared to risk even that. So whats different about the
Negro?
Why did you all sit there, enslaving each other even in America, and
still
enslaving each other even today in Africa, until a kindly but
misguided
white benefactor set you free? Is it because, as slaves, you were
fed,
watered, and housed, and that you as a race had no ambition beyond
that if
it entailed doing any work or taking any risks? What are you - lazy,
cowardly, stupid, or all of the above?
And you're *still* bleating about slavery now. If slavery is the root
of all
your problems, why did Australia prosper? England used Australia as a
dumping ground when her prisons overflowed. Within a hundred years, a
nation
manufactured from convicts in irons had its own autonomous elected
government, and barely a hundred years on from then, Australia is now
a
major economic power in the Pacific. And at no time have *they*
niggerwhined
for handouts from the mother country - in fact, if anything, it's
mostly
been the other way around.
You know what? It's because Australia is *white*. Oh yes it is. Just
imagine
if theres been a Black Australia. Look how few aborigines were able to
live
in Australia's climate, and now look at how many whites can. If
President
Monroe had sent his niggers there, they'd be niggerwhining about how
Bwana
dumped de po?black folks on a desert island in the middle of nowhere,
so
they never had a chance. Every week there would be news of a new
famine or
civil war in Australia. The Africoons would be slaughtering the
Aborigines,
or the other way around, or whatever. The collecting tin would come
out
regularly, but the money would be stolen and spent on Kalashnikovs,
and
Black Australia would still owe Whitey billions which we'll be
expected to
just forget. If all those unfortunate convicts we sent out there had
been
black, Australia today would just be yet another Liberia - a crappy
failed
nation of murderous warring niggers, with one hand held permanently
out for
money in the general direction of Bwana. And you know it.
So quit whining and thank the white man you live in America, not in
Africa.
Cletis.
| |
| SameAsB4 2007-03-07, 4:33 am |
|
"Cletis Perkins" < grandwizardcletis200
7@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1173256635.185240.68630@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Sorry, NIGGERS, but it's true: your race are a failed race because
> you're a
> feckless, unruly, uncivilized horde of feral proto-humans. You never
> figured
> out how to live in a society bigger than one or two squabbling
> families.
> Starting thousands of years ago, everyone else on this planet without
> exception did - they invented religion, the idea of law, and the ideas
> of
> property and respect for the value of human life. This enabled tribes
> to
> coalesce into bigger groups and become organized. The rest is history,
> or
> rather civilization.
> But your lot never did this, did they? Abstract thought and problem-
> solving
> have never been the black man's strengths, have they? Did they invent
> a
> long-lived and intellectually coherent religion? Nope. Did they ever
> build a
> city? Nope. Did they even invent bricks? Nope (the reason there's no
> Stonehenge in Africa is because it took more than 20 people to move
> the
> slabs of rock - clearly a non-starter in Africa, where assembling more
> than
> 20 niggers normally results in a war). Did they till the land? Nope.
> Did
> they domesticate an animal for their use? Nope. Did they invent a
> written
> language? Nope. Did they invent the wheel? Mainly, nope. Were they
> curious
> enough about what lay out across the sea to sail upon it? Nope.
> And blacks are the only "humans" on this planet of which all this is
> true.
> Eskimos are more technically advanced than blacks were, despite the
> handicap
> of having no raw materials to work with other than dead fish and
> snow.
> Indians managed to domesticate the elephant. Why couldn't Negros?
> So why do you fail everywhere even today? Let me offer a hypothesis.
What about whitemen can't jump theory, does that hurt your feelings?
> It's
> because feral behavior - innate savagery, murderous violence if
> annoyed,
> predisposition to rape many women and thus fecklessly father many
> children -
> conferred valuable survival advantages on individuals in the
> backward,
> Paleolithic milieu of Africa. But they don't help your kind in a
> civilized
> society. Unfortunately for the rest of us, the last few hundred years
> have
> not been long enough for these behaviors to have been domesticated out
> of
> you all. So you're all still at it.
> Let me illustrate this for you by analogy. Technically, an American
> pit bull
> terrier and an English golden retriever are exactly the same species.
> They
> can produce offspring, if crossbred.
> The former was bred to exhibit certain characteristics - wanton
> aggression,
> propensity to fight, physical strength, powerful bite, and so on. The
> latter
> was bred to retrieve birds shot and killed by its masters, and to do
> this,
> it has to have a docile, placid, unaggressive nature; otherwise it
> would
> treat what it found as its own kill and refuse to hand it over.
> Now imagine that your small children, aged maybe two or three years
> old, are
> going to be locked in a room with five or six of those dogs, and the
> dogs
> haven't been fed for a week.
> Which breed would you rather lock in there with *your* children?
> Hungry pit
> bulls, or hungry golden retrievers? Or do you figure that, even though
> they
> *look* differently, they're all the same species really, so of course
> the
> pit bulls certainly won't act any differently?
> Exactly!
> All this PC crap we hear spouted in the media about how "there's no
> such
> thing as race" is just that - crap. A dog has four legs and a tail; a
> cat
> also has four legs and a tail, but that doesn't make it a dog. The
> superficial similarity between cats and dogs and between whites and
> blacks
> is just that - superficial. If there really were no genetic
> difference
> between niggers and humans, then presumably my white woman and I could
> very
> easily produce a black baby between us at any time, and any nigger and
> his
> ho a white one.
> Whenever blacks achieve a certain critical mass numerically in a
> pre-existing non-black society, they start to exhibit their natural
> feral
> behavior and to turn their environment back into a recognizably
> African,
> essentially Stone Age one. Thus, Africa has the jungle; black enclaves
> have
> "da 'hood." Native Africans were small wandering herds of marginal
> animals,
> one famine away from extinction, and which therefore fought each
> other
> savagely for pieces of territory. Large groups of African-Americans?
> at
> liberty in the west actually deliberately break themselves down into
> *smaller*, tribal hordes, because they feel uneasy in and unaccustomed
> to a
> larger society. Negro gangs of twenty to fifty individuals assert
> their
> rights to tag?other peoples property through gang violence, but fail
> to
> co-operate otherwise.
> For instance, a 15- or 20-strong horde of Negroes was recently filmed
> by a
> security camera inside a London bank they were robbing. Once they had
> terrified the cashiers into handing over the money, they then fought
> *each
> other* for it, in the middle of the cashiers hall, like hyenas
> fighting over
> an antelope. Having stolen from the bank, they instantly started to
> steal
> from each other. The idea of escaping first, then sharing the swag,
> was just
> too complex for them to understand, never mind implement.
> And so it goes on. You *cannot* fuse blacks into existing large
> societies or
> standalone nations because they are just plain not adapted to it. I'm
> sorry
> for you niggers and for your savagery, and I'm sorry you were born a
> violent
> black aboriginal savage in a civilized society, but I'm more sorry for
> the
> white societies that are having to tolerate all your crime while we
> try to
> absorb you.
> This is why all black nations fail economically and sink into
> corruption,
> civil war, and permanent dependence on the white man's generosity.
> And presumably this is also why you pathetically allowed yourselves to
> be
> enslaved: you're savage enough still to be angry about it long after
> it
> ended, but you were too backward to stop it at the time. No black
> Spartacus,
> is there? Why no slave uprisings among blacks? Slaves repeatedly rose
> against the Romans even they knew they'd be crucified for it, when
> captured.
> *White* slaves, that is. They cared enough about their stolen liberty
> that
> they were prepared to risk even that. So whats different about the
> Negro?
> Why did you all sit there, enslaving each other even in America, and
> still
> enslaving each other even today in Africa, until a kindly but
> misguided
> white benefactor set you free? Is it because, as slaves, you were
> fed,
> watered, and housed, and that you as a race had no ambition beyond
> that if
> it entailed doing any work or taking any risks? What are you - lazy,
> cowardly, stupid, or all of the above?
> And you're *still* bleating about slavery now. If slavery is the root
> of all
> your problems, why did Australia prosper? England used Australia as a
> dumping ground when her prisons overflowed. Within a hundred years, a
> nation
> manufactured from convicts in irons had its own autonomous elected
> government, and barely a hundred years on from then, Australia is now
> a
> major economic power in the Pacific. And at no time have *they*
> niggerwhined
> for handouts from the mother country - in fact, if anything, it's
> mostly
> been the other way around.
> You know what? It's because Australia is *white*. Oh yes it is. Just
> imagine
> if theres been a Black Australia. Look how few aborigines were able to
> live
> in Australia's climate, and now look at how many whites can. If
> President
> Monroe had sent his niggers there, they'd be niggerwhining about how
> Bwana
> dumped de po?black folks on a desert island in the middle of nowhere,
> so
> they never had a chance. Every week there would be news of a new
> famine or
> civil war in Australia. The Africoons would be slaughtering the
> Aborigines,
> or the other way around, or whatever. The collecting tin would come
> out
> regularly, but the money would be stolen and spent on Kalashnikovs,
> and
> Black Australia would still owe Whitey billions which we'll be
> expected to
> just forget. If all those unfortunate convicts we sent out there had
> been
> black, Australia today would just be yet another Liberia - a crappy
> failed
> nation of murderous warring niggers, with one hand held permanently
> out for
> money in the general direction of Bwana. And you know it.
> So quit whining and thank the white man you live in America, not in
> Africa.
>
> Cletis.
>
| |
| natch 2007-03-07, 12:33 pm |
| On Mar 7, 3:37 am, "Cletis Perkins"
<grandwizardcletis2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Sorry, NIGGERS, but it's true: your race are a failed race because
> you're a
> feckless, unruly, uncivilized horde of feral proto-humans. You never
> figured
> out how to live in a society bigger than one or two squabbling
> families.
Theres a lot of names I will put up with but I will NOT be called
feckless, damnit!
Oh wait, Im not even black.
| |
| Madman 2007-03-07, 10:33 pm |
| On Mar 7, 9:14 am, "natch" <j...@msn.com> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 3:37 am, "Cletis Perkins"
>
> <grandwizardcletis2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Theres a lot of names I will put up with but I will NOT be called
> feckless, damnit!
> Oh wait, Im not even black.
Hey, the KKK called. They want their hood and burning cross back!
| |
| junker88 2007-03-15, 12:33 pm |
| On Mar 7, 12:45 pm, "Madman" <amars...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 9:14 am, "natch" <j...@msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hey, the KKK called. They want their hood and burning cross back!
Re: "Hey, the KKK called. They want their hood and burning cross
back!"
No, we don't. We always have plenty. He's O.K.
| |
| junker88 2007-03-15, 12:33 pm |
| On Mar 7, 1:37 am, "Cletis Perkins"
<grandwizardcletis2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Sorry, NIGGERS, but it's true: your race are a failed race because
> you're a
> feckless, unruly, uncivilized horde of feral proto-humans. You never
> figured
> out how to live in a society bigger than one or two squabbling
> families.
> Starting thousands of years ago, everyone else on this planet without
> exception did - they invented religion, the idea of law, and the ideas
> of
> property and respect for the value of human life. This enabled tribes
> to
> coalesce into bigger groups and become organized. The rest is history,
> or
> rather civilization.
> But your lot never did this, did they? Abstract thought and problem-
> solving
> have never been the black man's strengths, have they? Did they invent
> a
> long-lived and intellectually coherent religion? Nope. Did they ever
> build a
> city? Nope. Did they even invent bricks? Nope (the reason there's no
> Stonehenge in Africa is because it took more than 20 people to move
> the
> slabs of rock - clearly a non-starter in Africa, where assembling more
> than
> 20 niggers normally results in a war). Did they till the land? Nope.
> Did
> they domesticate an animal for their use? Nope. Did they invent a
> written
> language? Nope. Did they invent the wheel? Mainly, nope. Were they
> curious
> enough about what lay out across the sea to sail upon it? Nope.
> And blacks are the only "humans" on this planet of which all this is
> true.
> Eskimos are more technically advanced than blacks were, despite the
> handicap
> of having no raw materials to work with other than dead fish and
> snow.
> Indians managed to domesticate the elephant. Why couldn't Negros?
> So why do you fail everywhere even today? Let me offer a hypothesis.
> It's
> because feral behavior - innate savagery, murderous violence if
> annoyed,
> predisposition to rape many women and thus fecklessly father many
> children -
> conferred valuable survival advantages on individuals in the
> backward,
> Paleolithic milieu of Africa. But they don't help your kind in a
> civilized
> society. Unfortunately for the rest of us, the last few hundred years
> have
> not been long enough for these behaviors to have been domesticated out
> of
> you all. So you're all still at it.
> Let me illustrate this for you by analogy. Technically, an American
> pit bull
> terrier and an English golden retriever are exactly the same species.
> They
> can produce offspring, if crossbred.
> The former was bred to exhibit certain characteristics - wanton
> aggression,
> propensity to fight, physical strength, powerful bite, and so on. The
> latter
> was bred to retrieve birds shot and killed by its masters, and to do
> this,
> it has to have a docile, placid, unaggressive nature; otherwise it
> would
> treat what it found as its own kill and refuse to hand it over.
> Now imagine that your small children, aged maybe two or three years
> old, are
> going to be locked in a room with five or six of those dogs, and the
> dogs
> haven't been fed for a week.
> Which breed would you rather lock in there with *your* children?
> Hungry pit
> bulls, or hungry golden retrievers? Or do you figure that, even though
> they
> *look* differently, they're all the same species really, so of course
> the
> pit bulls certainly won't act any differently?
> Exactly!
> All this PC crap we hear spouted in the media about how "there's no
> such
> thing as race" is just that - crap. A dog has four legs and a tail; a
> cat
> also has four legs and a tail, but that doesn't make it a dog. The
> superficial similarity between cats and dogs and between whites and
> blacks
> is just that - superficial. If there really were no genetic
> difference
> between niggers and humans, then presumably my white woman and I could
> very
> easily produce a black baby between us at any time, and any nigger and
> his
> ho a white one.
> Whenever blacks achieve a certain critical mass numerically in a
> pre-existing non-black society, they start to exhibit their natural
> feral
> behavior and to turn their environment back into a recognizably
> African,
> essentially Stone Age one. Thus, Africa has the jungle; black enclaves
> have
> "da 'hood." Native Africans were small wandering herds of marginal
> animals,
> one famine away from extinction, and which therefore fought each
> other
> savagely for pieces of territory. Large groups of African-Americans?
> at
> liberty in the west actually deliberately break themselves down into
> *smaller*, tribal hordes, because they feel uneasy in and unaccustomed
> to a
> larger society. Negro gangs of twenty to fifty individuals assert
> their
> rights to tag?other peoples property through gang violence, but fail
> to
> co-operate otherwise.
> For instance, a 15- or 20-strong horde of Negroes was recently filmed
> by a
> security camera inside a London bank they were robbing. Once they had
> terrified the cashiers into handing over the money, they then fought
> *each
> other* for it, in the middle of the cashiers hall, like hyenas
> fighting over
> an antelope. Having stolen from the bank, they instantly started to
> steal
> from each other. The idea of escaping first, then sharing the swag,
> was just
> too complex for them to understand, never mind implement.
> And so it goes on. You *cannot* fuse blacks into existing large
> societies or
> standalone nations because they are just plain not adapted to it. I'm
> sorry
> for you niggers and for your savagery, and I'm sorry you were born a
> violent
> black aboriginal savage in a civilized society, but I'm more sorry for
> the
> white societies that are having to tolerate all your crime while we
> try to
> absorb you.
> This is why all black nations fail economically and sink into
> corruption,
> civil war, and permanent dependence on the white man's generosity.
> And presumably this is also why you pathetically allowed yourselves to
> be
> enslaved: you're savage enough still to be angry about it long after
> it
> ended, but you were too backward to stop it at the time. No black
> Spartacus,
> is there? Why no slave uprisings among blacks? Slaves repeatedly rose
> against the Romans even they knew they'd be crucified for it, when
> captured.
> *White* slaves, that is. They cared enough about their stolen liberty
> that
> they were prepared to risk even that. So whats different about the
> Negro?
> Why did you all sit there, enslaving each other even in America, and
> still
> enslaving each other even today in Africa, until a kindly but
> misguided
> white benefactor set you free? Is it because, as slaves, you were
> fed,
> watered, and housed, and that you as a race had no ambition beyond
> that if
> it entailed doing any work or taking any risks? What are you - lazy,
> cowardly, stupid, or all of the above?
> And you're *still* bleating about slavery now. If slavery is the root
> of all
> your problems, why did Australia prosper? England used Australia as a
> dumping ground when her prisons overflowed. Within a hundred years, a
> nation
> manufactured from convicts in irons had its own autonomous elected
> government, and barely a hundred years on from then, Australia is now
> a
> major economic power in the Pacific. And at no time have *they*
> niggerwhined
> for handouts from the mother country - in fact, if anything, it's
> mostly
> been the other way around.
> You know what? It's because Australia is *white*. Oh yes it is. Just
> imagine
> if theres been a Black Australia. Look how few aborigines were able to
> live
> in Australia's climate, and now look at how many whites can. If
> President
> Monroe had sent his niggers there, they'd be niggerwhining about how
> Bwana
> dumped de po?black folks on a desert island in the middle of nowhere,
> so
> they never had a chance. Every week there would be news of a new
> famine or
> civil war in Australia. The Africoons would be slaughtering the
> Aborigines,
> or the other way around, or whatever. The collecting tin would come
> out
> regularly, but the money would be stolen and spent on Kalashnikovs,
> and
> Black Australia would still owe Whitey billions which we'll be
> expected to
> just forget. If all those unfortunate convicts we sent out there had
> been
> black, Australia today would just be yet another Liberia - a crappy
> failed
> nation of murderous warring niggers, with one hand held permanently
> out for
> money in the general direction of Bwana. And you know it.
> So quit whining and thank the white man you live in America, not in
> Africa.
>
> Cletis.
Excellent Post, Brother.
Stay strong.
| |
| DisiLLusioneD 2007-03-16, 4:33 am |
| On 15 Mar 2007 08:41:47 -0700, "junker88" <junker.88@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mar 7, 1:37 am, "Cletis Perkins"
><grandwizardcletis2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>Excellent Post, Brother.
>Stay strong.
hahaha. Zekhol!!!
| |
| Posi Agen 2007-03-16, 4:33 am |
|
"DisiLLusioneD" <Riff@use.net> wrote in message
news:8tcjv25d1lnermt
9lvop56tn6ei3s0uq1c@
4ax.com...
> On 15 Mar 2007 08:41:47 -0700, "junker88" <junker.88@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> hahaha. Zekhol!!!
BODY COUNT SHIT ANT LYKE TAHT
POSI
| |
|
|
|
|
|