Cellular forums Home > Archive > Sprint PCS > October 2006 > Re: Sprint coverage in L.A. & S. CA









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Sprint coverage in L.A. & S. CA
lancepickens@gmail.com

2006-10-24, 10:33 pm

Sprint isn't so hot in SoCal, I have been here a year now and service
is spotty at best.
In many cases, the only place where I can consistently receive and make
calls is on
the highways. I've been a Sprint/Nextel Customer for over a decade and
a mobile user
for nearly as long and this is the most dissatisfied I have ever been.
In my previous locale
of Chicago, Sprint worked fine.

On Oct 17, 9:50 am, "X-Zone" <X...@guesswho.com> wrote:
> Virgin Mobile, which uses Sprint for connection has wonderful coverage in N.
> Texas where I am, but a friend who lives in Palm Springs is unsure if the
> coverage there would be comparable to the great coverage that Cingular
> offers there. So... just how good is Sprint in S. CA? thanks


skip

2006-10-25, 10:33 am

"lancepickens@gmail.com" <lancepickens@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1161737238.119896.291300@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:

> Sprint isn't so hot in SoCal, I have been here a year now and service
> is spotty at best.
> In many cases, the only place where I can consistently receive and
> make calls is on
> the highways. I've been a Sprint/Nextel Customer for over a decade and
> a mobile user
> for nearly as long and this is the most dissatisfied I have ever been.
> In my previous locale
> of Chicago, Sprint worked fine.
>
> On Oct 17, 9:50 am, "X-Zone" <X...@guesswho.com> wrote:
>
>

We use out phones for emergancy use pretty much all the time. We are on the
west side and . We usually are at the Sony Studios or Paramount. In any
case I know of no dead spots at all. Please let me knnow where they are
Steven J. Sobol

2006-10-25, 3:33 pm

In article <1161737238.119896.291300@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>, lancepickens@gmail.com wrote:
> Sprint isn't so hot in SoCal, I have been here a year now and service
> is spotty at best.


Which part of SoCal?

> In many cases, the only place where I can consistently receive and make
> calls is on
> the highways.


Which part of SoCal?

> a mobile user
> for nearly as long and this is the most dissatisfied I have ever been.
> In my previous locale
> of Chicago, Sprint worked fine.


Again... there are plenty of places where Sprint works fine in Southern
California. There may be some where Sprint doesn't work fine, but for you
to say the coverage sucks means nothing unless you let us know where it sucks.

For example, in my area of SoCal which is half(ish) rural and half(ish)
"suburban", up in the High Desert, Verizon has better coverage way out in
the sticks, north of Victorville between there and Barstow. Sprint has none.
East, going towards Lucerne, Sprint has coverage way out past the edge of
Verizon's coverage (except that Verizon has coverage on Highway 18 between
Apple Valley and Lucerne Valley).

So, it all depends on your specific location.

--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
Victorville, California PGP:0xE3AE35ED

It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.
LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com