|
|
| jim-g 2006-11-16, 10:33 pm |
| Sprintpcs says keep checking every couple of days for when we get their
picture service part of the Vision pkg working for the Treo 600 after
more than a week. So cancelled 'em today and movin' on. Jim-G
--
make any Reply to Newsgroup as return address is not valid.
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2006-11-17, 4:33 am |
| You will be back. Sprint is the best of all wireless providers. See you here
next month.
"jim-g" <nowhere@ether.net> wrote in message
news:_p97h.2341$rn1.1905@newsfe19.lga...
> Sprintpcs says keep checking every couple of days for when we get their
> picture service part of the Vision pkg working for the Treo 600 after more
> than a week. So cancelled 'em today and movin' on. Jim-G
> --
> make any Reply to Newsgroup as return address is not valid.
| |
|
| jim-g wrote:
>
> Sprintpcs says keep checking every couple of days for when we get their
> picture service part of the Vision pkg working for the Treo 600 after
> more than a week. So cancelled 'em today and movin' on. Jim-G
"More than a week," huh?
Aren't you the patient one! <g>
Just out of curiosity, which carrier are you going with?
Notan
| |
|
| Not so patient but see it this way... the people I spoke to were
congenial and seemed professional but, all I kept getting were excuses
concerning when the service would be available and could give no end in
sight to the problem plus;
when I called to cancel there was only the question why and they
practically paid me to get out. So 'that' was a no brainer.
They must consider whatever isn't happening more work than we are worth
at $80/month.
Considering options but appears Verizon.
Notan wrote:
> jim-g wrote:
>
> "More than a week," huh?
>
> Aren't you the patient one! <g>
>
> Just out of curiosity, which carrier are you going with?
>
> Notan
--
make any Reply to Newsgroup as return address is not valid.
| |
| Chuck Palm 2006-11-17, 3:33 pm |
| jim-g wrote:
> Not so patient but see it this way... the people I spoke to were
> congenial and seemed professional but, all I kept getting were excuses
> concerning when the service would be available and could give no end in
> sight to the problem plus;
>
> when I called to cancel there was only the question why and they
> practically paid me to get out. So 'that' was a no brainer.
>
> They must consider whatever isn't happening more work than we are worth
> at $80/month.
>
> Considering options but appears Verizon.
>
> Notan wrote:
>
>
>
>
Verizon - great prices starting at $79.95 for unlimited data - what a
deal ............
Chuck Palm
| |
| Steven P. McNicoll 2006-11-19, 7:33 am |
|
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@TheBitBucket.com> wrote in message
news:Fqb7h.54383$lv2.33311@newsfe06.phx...
>
> You will be back. Sprint is the best of all wireless providers. See you
> here next month.
>
Have you been a customer of all wireless providers?
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2006-11-19, 3:33 pm |
| All except T-Mobile. Just left Verizon 1.5 years ago.
"Steven P. McNicoll" < roncachamp@nospamear
thlink.net> wrote in message
news:82Z7h.820$sf5.310@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Mij Adyaw" <mij@TheBitBucket.com> wrote in message
> news:Fqb7h.54383$lv2.33311@newsfe06.phx...
>
> Have you been a customer of all wireless providers?
>
| |
| Steven P. McNicoll 2006-11-19, 3:33 pm |
|
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@TheBitBucket.com> wrote in message
news:4M18h.5530$nL1.3160@newsfe11.phx...
>
> All except T-Mobile. Just left Verizon 1.5 years ago.
>
Then you're not in a position to judge which company is the best of all
wireless providers.
| |
| Mij Adyaw 2006-11-19, 3:33 pm |
| No, However, I have a good opinion redarding Cingular, Verizon, and Sprint
since I have been with all of them. I will not comment on T-mobile since I
have not used their service.
"Steven P. McNicoll" < roncachamp@nospamear
thlink.net> wrote in message
news:oQ18h.768$1s6.327@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Mij Adyaw" <mij@TheBitBucket.com> wrote in message
> news:4M18h.5530$nL1.3160@newsfe11.phx...
>
> Then you're not in a position to judge which company is the best of all
> wireless providers.
>
>
>
| |
| Todd Allcock 2006-11-19, 3:33 pm |
| At 19 Nov 2006 18:59:32 +0000 Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
[color=darkred]
>
> Then you're not in a position to judge which company is the best of
all
> wireless providers.
>
Although I'm personally a VERY satisfied T-Mo customer, their large
Achilles' heel is national coverage, which is a solid notch below the
big three. I could easily see someone who travels a lot (particularly
by road) eliminating them from contention and having to settle for one
of the big three carriers despite their higher costs and inferior
customer service... ;-)
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
| Steven J. Sobol 2006-11-19, 10:33 pm |
| In article < 4560bbe2$0$21205$882
60bb3@free.teranews.com>, Todd Allcock wrote:
> Although I'm personally a VERY satisfied T-Mo customer, their large
> Achilles' heel is national coverage, which is a solid notch below the
> big three. I could easily see someone who travels a lot (particularly
> by road) eliminating them from contention and having to settle for one
> of the big three carriers despite their higher costs and inferior
> customer service... ;-)
But with their true no-roaming-nationwide calling plans (as opposed to,
say, Verizon's nationwide-where-we-feel-like-giving-you-service), and the
new ability for postpay accounts to roam onto 850 MHz Cingular GSM networks
as well as a number of 1900 MHz networks, I see this as a lot less of an
issue than it would have been a couple years ago.
--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
Victorville, California PGP:0xE3AE35ED
It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.
|
|
|
|