| Author |
Re: alt.cellular.t-mobile - now available
|
|
| Phil Schuman 2006-04-20, 2:48 am |
| it's now being carried by the SBC news servers
"Sven Golly" < sven_golly@myrealbox
.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97A7C8118E61
Bsvengolly@81.174.50.80...
> "Ben Skversky" <bskversky1@verizon.net> wrote in news:2hC0g.2371$e55.2043
> @trnddc02:
>
>
> Give it a few months. And x-post to both.
>
> --
| |
|
| Phil Schuman wrote:
> it's now being carried by the SBC news servers
I've requested it on sonic.net. It's incredible that it took so long for
this group to be created.
| |
| Thomas T. Veldhouse 2006-04-20, 5:48 pm |
| In alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> Phil Schuman wrote:
>
> I've requested it on sonic.net. It's incredible that it took so long for
> this group to be created.
There was a bit of resistance by those who like to hoard power I guess.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
| |
| John Navas 2006-04-20, 5:48 pm |
| [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In < 44471bda$0$1594$742e
c2ed@news.sonic.net> on Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:27:56
-0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>Phil Schuman wrote:
>
>I've requested it on sonic.net. It's incredible that it took so long for
>this group to be created.
Still a long way from making it, as it's not carried by the Worldnet part of
SBC, Google, and other big news providers I've checked.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
| |
| Thomas T. Veldhouse 2006-04-20, 5:48 pm |
| In alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
> Still a long way from making it, as it's not carried by the Worldnet part of
> SBC, Google, and other big news providers I've checked.
>
OK ... I didn't post my response here that I did in alt.cellular.cingular.
So, I will rephrase it differently here. You didn't bother to check some of
the biggest carriers then like Easynews and Supernews. We know full well
Giganews will take it up soon.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
| |
| John Navas 2006-04-20, 5:48 pm |
| [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In < 4447d21c$0$277$80463
68a@newsreader.iphouse.net> on 20 Apr 2006 18:25:32
GMT, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
>OK ... I didn't post my response here that I did in alt.cellular.cingular.
>So, I will rephrase it differently here. You didn't bother to check some of
>the biggest carriers then like Easynews and Supernews.
I "bothered" to check some other large carriers, two of which I identified by
name. My apologies for not checking the ones you happened to think of.
>We know full well
>Giganews will take it up soon.
We?
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ Cingu...less_FA
Q>
| |
| Thomas T. Veldhouse 2006-04-20, 5:48 pm |
| John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
>
> We?
>
We, yes. Everybody in this newsgroup, including you.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
| |
| Sven Golly 2006-04-21, 2:48 am |
| John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote in
news:MTN1g.52777$1q4.12671@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Still a long way from making it, as it's not carried by the Worldnet
> part of SBC, Google, and other big news providers I've checked.
Geez dude. What IS your problem? This is a damn ALT group we're talking
about here. I could understand you're being hacked off by some rogue rec.
mgroup but alt's are NOT BFDs. Hell Google still carries tons of hipcrime
groups so that's no indication of anything.
This effort seems very personal to you.
--
Sven Golly
Yah sure by gosh by yumpin' yiminy
Trolling as usual
Remove the "_" to reply
| |
|
| Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> In alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
> OK ... I didn't post my response here that I did in alt.cellular.cingular.
> So, I will rephrase it differently here. You didn't bother to check some of
> the biggest carriers then like Easynews and Supernews. We know full well
> Giganews will take it up soon.
>
It's up on sonic.net.
Can anyone figure out why Navas is so upset about alt.cellular.t-mobile?
It's pretty clear why he lies so much about Cingular, but why was he so
adamantly against alt.cellular.t-mobile? The only plausible reason that
I could come up with, is that he doesn't want new newsgroups when a
carrier changes names because if the AT&T acquisition of BellSouth goes
through, then Cingular will become AT&T Wireless, and alt.cellular.attws
will take the place of alt.cellular.cingular, which is a group that
Navas originally proposed.
| |
| Cyrus Afzali 2006-04-21, 5:48 pm |
| On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:03:35 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote:
>Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
>It's up on sonic.net.
>
>Can anyone figure out why Navas is so upset about alt.cellular.t-mobile?
Navas gets upset about most everything that he's not directly involved
in. Seems to me getting upset over this whole thing is ridiculous.
This newsgroup's not going away, so nobody's going to force him to go
over to T-Mobile. And since he's not a T-Mobile customer, I'm not sure
why he cares anyway.
>
>It's pretty clear why he lies so much about Cingular, but why was he so
>adamantly against alt.cellular.t-mobile? The only plausible reason that
>I could come up with, is that he doesn't want new newsgroups when a
>carrier changes names because if the AT&T acquisition of BellSouth goes
>through, then Cingular will become AT&T Wireless, and alt.cellular.attws
>will take the place of alt.cellular.cingular, which is a group that
>Navas originally proposed.
I'd say that's it.
| |
|
| SMS wrote:
>
> It's up on sonic.net.
>
> Can anyone figure out why Navas is so upset about alt.cellular.t-mobile?
There is a few people i just ignore. He is one of them. I hate visiting
the cingular group just for that reason too.
| |
| B. Wright 2006-04-22, 5:48 pm |
| SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone figure out why Navas is so upset about alt.cellular.t-mobile?
Other than the fact that he's a complete twat? No.
| |
|
| Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> John Navas < spamfilter0@navasgro
up.com> wrote:
>
> We, yes. Everybody in this newsgroup, including you.
Google Groups will have it soon as well.
| |
| Don Cole 2006-04-27, 5:48 pm |
| Phil,
Sorry to say but SBC/ATT "KC News" in MO does not yet have
alt.cellular.t-mobile.
Don
"Phil Schuman" < pschuman_nospam_me@i
nterserv.com> wrote in message
news:GhE1g.4327$Lm5.3731@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> it's now being carried by the SBC news servers
>
> "Sven Golly" < sven_golly@myrealbox
.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97A7C8118E61
Bsvengolly@81.174.50.80...
>
>
>
| |
| Phil Schuman 2006-04-29, 11:48 pm |
| bummer -
I guess each SBC/ATT regional news server
has to have the add request made locally...
"Don Cole" <doncole36@allnet.com> wrote in message
news:tu94g.21309$tN3.13602@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> Phil,
>
> Sorry to say but SBC/ATT "KC News" in MO does not yet have
> alt.cellular.t-mobile.
>
> Don
>
> "Phil Schuman" < pschuman_nospam_me@i
nterserv.com> wrote in message
> news:GhE1g.4327$Lm5.3731@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
news:2hC0g.2371$e55.2043[color=darkred]
newsgroup?[color=darkred]
>
>
| |
| John Richards 2006-04-29, 11:48 pm |
| There's no particular reason to use SBC's regional news servers.
I use the central one, news.prodigy.net, and it carries alt.cellular.t-mobile.
You can use any of SBC's news (NNTP) servers with the same username
and password.
--
John Richards
"Phil Schuman" < pschuman_NO_SPAM_ME@
interserv.com> wrote in message news:ToR4g.63857$_S7.42356@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...[color=darkred]
> bummer -
> I guess each SBC/ATT regional news server
> has to have the add request made locally...
>
> "Don Cole" <doncole36@allnet.com> wrote in message
> news:tu94g.21309$tN3.13602@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
| |
| Mike Schumann 2006-04-30, 5:48 pm |
| If you want the newsgroup to take off, it needs to be on ALL of the news
servers, particularly Google. Untill that happens, people will continue
using the old group.
Mike Schumann
"John Richards" <jr70@blackhole.invalid> wrote in message
news:r7U4g.107$zR3.31@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> There's no particular reason to use SBC's regional news servers.
> I use the central one, news.prodigy.net, and it carries
> alt.cellular.t-mobile.
> You can use any of SBC's news (NNTP) servers with the same username
> and password.
>
> --
> John Richards
>
>
>
> "Phil Schuman" < pschuman_NO_SPAM_ME@
interserv.com> wrote in message
> news:ToR4g.63857$_S7.42356@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>
| |
| Andy M - Tampa Bay 2006-05-11, 11:48 pm |
|
"John" <ClipperMiami@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147359932.675858.213590@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Its April 11 and it still isn't on Google Groups.
>
you mean, May 11. Check your calendar.
| |
| Thomas T. Veldhouse 2006-05-12, 5:48 pm |
| John <ClipperMiami@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its April 11 and it still isn't on Google Groups.
>
Request it. It is now avaible with Giganews and all of its customers (like
Comcast). Personally, I think posts from Google have done little postive
justice for USENET.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
| |
| Mike Schumann 2006-05-13, 2:48 am |
| Maybe not, but being able to search postings using Google is essential. If
the group isn't on Google, people won't switch.
Mike Schumann
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4464be94$0$723$
8046368a@newsreader.iphouse.net...
> John <ClipperMiami@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Request it. It is now avaible with Giganews and all of its customers
> (like
> Comcast). Personally, I think posts from Google have done little postive
> justice for USENET.
>
> --
> Thomas T. Veldhouse
> Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
>
| |
| Thomas T. Veldhouse 2006-05-15, 5:48 pm |
| Mike Schumann <mike-nospam@traditions-nospam.com> wrote:
> Maybe not, but being able to search postings using Google is essential. If
> the group isn't on Google, people won't switch.
>
I suspect it won't show up automagically, so somebody needs to request it.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
|
|
|
|