Cellular forums Home > Archive > GPS > December 2007 > Re: MI5-Persecution: How to Identify the Persecutors (12347)









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: MI5-Persecution: How to Identify the Persecutors (12347)
Roy Hewson

2007-12-20, 12:33 pm

For Crying out loud: cant this poster be blocked. or banned or something.
I am sure he has escaped from somewhere.
<MI5-Victim@mi5.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07111613384786
@4ax.com...
>
> MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 19 March, 1999
>
> If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This
>
> Please.... keep your response to one page if you can! I have had several
> people faxing my article back to me, including one MP faxing back twenty
> pages. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted without being read.
>
> Theyve started again. Why? I have no idea.
>
> Unhappily, the persecutors, whoever they might be, have started their
> activities again over the last two weeks. Usually they try to blame their
> activities on their victim, but this time they have stopped even
> pretending that the persecution is my fault. Their verbal abuse appears as
> gratuitous as it is vicious.
>
> Last Sunday 14 March, I went for a meal in Londons Chinatown with some
> friends. As we were walking down Gerrard St, a man shouted loudly, twice,
> the obscenity which has been directed at me for some three years now. This
> followed previous incidents where the same words had been used. It is very
> upsetting to be verbally abused in this way and to know that the cowardly
> abusers are guaranteed to "get away with it" because if you report it then
> it will be assumed to be part of your illness.
>
> Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever
> refuses to help.
>
> MI5 Persecution : How to Identify the Persecutors
>
> Usually delusional thinking does not allow the perpetrators to be
> identified, or the alleged persecution to be proved. My so-called
> "delusions" are different, because I have several times over a period of
> some nine years seen the same people, in widely varying places. Most
> importantly, their names have been recorded, on aircraft passenger lists
> and hospital register; and if only the police would do their job
> conscientiously then the persecutors could be identified and this unhappy
> story brought to a final conclusion.
>
> BA93 Heathrow->Toronto, 10 June 1993
>
> In 1993 I flew to Toronto for a holiday. On disembarking from the
> aircraft, a group of four men who travelled together looked in my
> direction, and one of them said, laughing, "If he tries to run away well
> find him".
>
> I was absolutely stunned when I heard this. I wasnt surprised that they
> had followed me to Canada, but it shocked me that they had been on the
> same flight, and that one of them had foolishly given their group
> away. Unfortunately I was so stunned that I made no attempt to stop them
> as they got off the flight and proceeded into the terminal. I did not see
> these people again during my visit to Toronto. I do not know whether they
> followed me, or whether they were only part of a larger group, some of
> whom may have already been on the ground and awaiting my arrival.
>
> Over the next few years I made a number of attempts, all unsuccessful, to
> obtain the passenger list for this flight. British Airways keeps passenger
> flight coupons for each flight; so if only the police would do the job
> that is being asked if them, then these four persecutors could be
> identified, and thus their employing organisation, which is very likely to
> be the Security Service, determined.
>
> These four men were, apart from the joker who looked the odd man out in
> the pack, very serious individuals. They appeared to be in their forties
> or fifties, and my impression on seeing them was that they might have been
> former soldiers. Their campaign against me concentrates on how
> "funny" their abuse is; but in this they are plainly lying, because they
> realise how awful will be the damage to the establishment of which they
> form part, if the truth about the persecution ever sees the light of day.
>
> The riddle of "Alan Holdsworth"
>
> During Oct/Nov 1996 I saw a doctor several times about an infection, and
> on 2 Nov 1996 I went to Emergency at the Ottawa Civic Hospital and saw Dr
> Worthington, who was then Chief of Emergency Medicine. I had to wait
> several hours before being seen, and several people jumped ahead of me in
> the queue. One of these was a grey-haired man in his forties or
> fifties. This may have been one of the men on the BA flight in 1993; I
> cannot be sure. When Dr Worthington asked his name, he loudly said, "Tad",
> which is the common abbreviation of my name. Dr Worthington looked
> puzzled, glanced at the sheet in front of him, and said, "but your name is
> Alan Holdsworth isnt it?". (I am pretty sure his Christian name was
> Alan; I cannot be sure of the surname). The man looked put out, and said
> quietly, "yes".
>
> Unfortunately, I did not follow up this incident immediately. Some time
> later, I wrote to Dr Worthington to ask the name of this patient, but he
> refused to give the name out.
>
> I saw this person again two and a half years later, at Ottawa Airport,
> just as I was about to leave for England. In the warm weather, he was
> wearing a coat and woolly cap, and pacing up and down in a menacing and
> aggressive manner. Presumably he thought he was pretending to be a
> "nutter" and in this way was getting at me; my impression is that he
> doesnt need to pretend, Holdsworth or whatever his name is is clearly a
> psychopath and in a healthy society such a person would be locked up,
> instead of being paid public money to exercise his psychopathic
> instincts. But todays Britain, a country where the MI5 secret police are
> given free rein and nobody dares raise a voice in protest, is not a
> healthy society.
>
> "He doesnt know who we are"
>
> For some reason, whenever I take a British Airways flight, I get hassled
> by the "persecutors who wont admit theyre MI5". Since this business
> started, I have travelled BA three times; once in June 1993 BA93 (see
> above), once to/from Europe during Dec 95/Jan 96, and once in June 1998
> with my mother to visit her family. The last journey, I was abused by two
> "plants" who kept repeating, loudly, "paranoid" (I have this recorded on
> minidisc). Presumably British Airways gives MI5 the seating plans for
> their flights, which allows MI5 to position their agents of abuse three
> rows behind me, so I cant face them, and they are throwing abuse at the
> back of my head. I have travelled BA as infrequently as possible; to
> Canada, I usually travel Air Canada.
>
> Anyway, lets return to the second of the three BA trips, and in particular
> to the flight on 2 January 1996 from Berlin Tegel, to Heathrow, and
> onwards to Montreal Mirabel. Id waited all night at Tegel for the flight,
> and was very tired on reaching Heathrow. On the plane to Montreal, two
> youths sat about three/four rows behind me and to the right, in the window
> seats. One of them, a rather fat "XXXXXXX" to use the Americanism (it
> fits), kept on going on about "this bloke", saying among many other
> things, "he doesnt know who we are".
>
> Now that form of words is particularly interesting, because from May 1995,
> some 8 months previously, I had been vigorously denouncing the "MI5
> Persecution" on Usenet. So if Id guessed wrong, then you might expect the
> harassers to crow about it; which they have not done. If I had guessed
> right, and the persecutors have been silent before and since this flight,
> then they could either admit they were MI5, which would be a very serious
> thing for them to own up to, or they could brazenly lie, in which case I
> would report their lie, and since many people must surely know who they
> are, they would lose all credibility. So they have remained silent; apart
> from this one phrase on the BA flight, where one of their agents said, "he
> doesnt know who we are". Note carefully that this phrase is NOT a denial,
> it only appears to be a denial; since it does not say that my guess was
> wrong; it only states the objective fact that I do not know the identity
> of the persecutors, without giving any information as to the validity of
> my guess. Which leads me to posit that my guess was correct.
>
> 12347
>
>
> --
> Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
> ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
> Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access



LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com