|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Garmin GPS > July 2007 > 60 CSx vs 76 CSx
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Earl J 2007-07-25, 10:38 am |
| Other than the obvious differences in size and placement of screen, overall
size and shape, ability to float etc. are there any performance differences?
Why the different wording under built-in memory, no vs. none (cannot load
maps to memory) aren't they both the same in that regard? Thanks!
| |
|
| "Earl J" <mrekj@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:lKqdnQe9L- rhwDrbnZ2dnUVZ_oaonZ
2d@comcast.com...
> Other than the obvious differences in size and placement of screen,
> overall size and shape, ability to float etc. are there any performance
> differences? Why the different wording under built-in memory, no vs. none
> (cannot load maps to memory) aren't they both the same in that regard?
> Thanks!
As far as I know the units are technically identical other than the points
you raise and the size of the micro SD card supplied with the them at first
purchase.
| |
| Holger Issle 2007-07-26, 4:33 am |
| On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:29:05 +0100, "Dick" wrote:
> As far as I know the units are technically identical other than the points
> you raise and the size of the micro SD card supplied with the them at first
> purchase.
The mount of the micro SD is different in the units, and doesn't the
76 one have a connector for an external antenna and the 60 does not?
--
Ciao,
Holger (GUS-KOTAL, GUS#1100)
90-92 Honda CB400 10 Mm | 93-95 Yamaha TDM 850 26 Mm
95-97 KTM 620 LC4 13 Mm | seit 97 BMW R1100GS 50 Mm (Die Renndrecksau!)
cu @ http://www.issle.de
| |
| Pegleg 2007-07-26, 7:33 am |
| On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:45:12 +0200, Holger Issle <Holger@Issle.de>
wrote:
>The mount of the micro SD is different in the units, and doesn't the
>76 one have a connector for an external antenna and the 60 does not?
Mounting may be different but the 60CSx does have an external antenna
connector,
| |
| Anatoliy Kurgan 2007-07-27, 4:33 am |
| Earl J wrote:
> Other than the obvious differences in size and placement of screen,
> overall size and shape, ability to float etc. are there any performance
> differences? Why the different wording under built-in memory, no vs.
> none (cannot load maps to memory) aren't they both the same in that
> regard? Thanks!
Ability to float:
[url]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=- 2361118443564888241[
/url]
|
|
|
|
|