Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cell Phones in Great Britain > May 2006 > Cancer danger at Australian mail centre









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Cancer danger at Australian mail centre
Lenny

2006-05-28, 5:48 pm

It's only anectdotal but hey ho, the numbers do seem rather large!

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/2071934/
Cancer danger at Australian mail centre: Postal workers demand inquiry and
relocation A Cautionary Tale: The Capalaba Post Office

Before the RMIT building EMF controversy is written off as
‘case-closed’ with both Radiofrequency and ELF magnetic fields being
given the all-clear, it is worthwhile to consider another cancer building
scare that I was briefly involved with which took place about 5 years ago
at the Capalaba Post Office in Queensland.

In that case, there was a reported high incidence of cancer and other
illnesses. Apparently, over the previous 10 years, out of 53 full-time
staff, 25 had developed cancer or auto-immune diseases, at least four had
died and others had serious illnesses. Counting part-time workers, 25
percent of the workforce have developed illnesses since 1998. The concerns
of the workers was that there was an Energex electricity sub-station next
to the Post Office and they were wondering if there was EMF coming from
the substation that could be the cause of the illnesses.

Preliminary ELF magnetic field testing around the post office and the
electricity sub-station indicated that the levels in the Post office were
generally quite low (below 3 mG by memory). When I was asked to comment on
the measurements I said the building readings were generally low, but
there were areas of concern in the staff lunchroom and at the front
counter. I concluded that “At this point, you can’t say that it is an
electromagnetic field problem. The best I can say for now is we have
looked at the electromagnetic field angle and there are a few areas of
concern.” One of my concerns was, according to the building plans of the
PO, that the building’s concrete slab was poured over two electrical
earthing pads that served as the return circuit for the substation.
However spot readings at the time did not indicate a problem and I left
the case at that point. As it turned out however (see below) it can be
very misleading to just rely on spot readings and this should serve as a
cautionary tale for RMIT.

With the Capalaba PO however there were additional confounding factors,
mainly previous soil contamination from a nice mix of petrol, arsenic and
PCBs, so trying to find a single cause for the apparent cluster of illness
was impossible and most likely a combination of environmental factors
making for a very sick building.

For more on the Capalaba case see: Cancer danger at Australian mail
centre: Postal workers demand inquiry and relocation
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/m.../post-m05.shtml

and:

Interview with Australian postal worker: “Hell will freeze over before I
believe that these illnesses are a coincidence”
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/m.../poin-m05.shtml

However, as a result of the current RMIT situation, I received an email
today from one of the CEPU’s consultants who had worked on the Capalaba
PO case and who had further examined the EMF angle in the building.
Exerpts follow:

Hi Don, JS here. I did some consulting work for CEPU on the Capalaba Post
Office anomoly which had a cluster of terminal illnesses which was very
significant [in my view] - but ’swept under the carpet’ by Comcare
Australia ………. in the early part of 2002.

The issue there was ground current [referred to as stray voltage by some]
and its relationship to off-peak signals sent to the nearby transformers.
MilliGauss readings taken most of the time were not especially damning,
but when the off-peak signals arrived, Gauss meters went off scale and ELF
fluctuations were so unstable and large they were difficult to measure. We
concluded that the monitors needed to be continuous over a minimum period
of [at least] 24 hours and preferably weeks or months. The point is - the
readings can be timed to miss the relevant data. Unfortunately, we did not
have the equipment and funds to continue the
investigation…………….. Just pointing this out in case it’s
relevant to current researchers…………
LinkBot





Other Archives: Real Estate forum archive | Web Design archive | Software support archive | PC Hardware reviews archive | Medical topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 cellphonetopics.com