|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cell Phones in Great Britain > July 2007 > BT and T-Mobile reach major network agreement
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
BT and T-Mobile reach major network agreement
|
|
| Sunil Sood 2007-07-19, 10:33 am |
| T-Mobile and BT Wholesale have announced a new agreement that sees BT link
thousands of T-Mobile's base station sites around the UK to the T-Mobile
network. The contract, potentially worth several hundred million pounds over
the next five years, will deliver T-Mobile a cost-efficient and flexible
next generation service to support its growth plans and help avoid any
investment risk in building out its own capability.
BT will connect thousands of T-Mobile's base stations around the UK to the
central T-Mobile network. Leased lines will be used to connect these sites
at first before an Ethernet-based service is introduced.
The new Ethernet service will further enhance the delivery of access and
backhaul services to T-Mobile. It will be designed and built to be fully
compatible with BT's 21st Century Network (21CN), the most advanced next
generation network (NGN) in the world.
More at
http://www.btplc.com/news/articles/...ebf027b87cdc%7d
Regards
Sunil
| |
|
| On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:55:21 +0100, "Sunil Sood"
<news@soods.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>BT will connect thousands of T-Mobile's base stations around the UK to the
>central T-Mobile network.
Which begs the question, if thousands of T-Mobile's base stations
aren't connected to the T-Mobile network, which network are they
connected to?
--
-- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net
-- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11
-- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road
| |
| We are the robots 2007-07-19, 10:33 am |
| Sunil Sood wrote:
<snip>
Who do they lease their lines from at present then?
--
And.
CV12
| |
|
| nickmooney@spamcop.net declared for all the world to hear...
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:55:21 +0100, "Sunil Sood"
> <news@soods.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Which begs the question, if thousands of T-Mobile's base stations
> aren't connected to the T-Mobile network, which network are they
> connected to?
Probably Virgin, formerly NTL.
--
Regards
Jon
| |
|
|
"Jon" <spam@jonparker.plus.com> wrote in message
news:MPG. 210a8a35bb9080ba98ab
73@text.usenet.plus.net...
> nickmooney@spamcop.net declared for all the world to hear...
>
> Probably Virgin, formerly NTL.
> --
> Regards
> Jon
Not necessarily, in Scotland many mobile sites use thus, it is quite common
for one mobile company to have their own link to a site (probably because
they were first to build on that site) and other companies use that though
perhaps just back to a larger site where they can connect to their main
network.
MB
| |
| Jon Pitts 2007-07-27, 3:33 pm |
|
"MB" <mb@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:46a082d8$0$2248
9$4c56ba96@master.news.zetnet.net...
>
>
> Not necessarily, in Scotland many mobile sites use thus, it is quite
> common for one mobile company to have their own link to a site (probably
> because they were first to build on that site) and other companies use
> that though perhaps just back to a larger site where they can connect to
> their main network.
>
> MB
>
There's also the timeslot issue. It may well be that if 2 or 3 networks
share a single site in a remote area like the Highlands, they can share a
single 2Meg PCM link. One single network may well not need 30 timeslots, but
a couple of networks sharing the cost and responsiblity of the link, could
fill one up quite nicely.
Regards
Jon.
--
Jon Pitts
Email: jon@pitts50.co.uk Attachments: files@pitts50.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|