|
Cellular forums Home > Archive > Cell Phones in Great Britain > April 2008 > Re: Which suckers use an iPhone
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Which suckers use an iPhone
|
|
| childish.chris@googlemail.com 2008-04-01, 7:33 am |
| On Apr 1, 10:18 am, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclay...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> <childish.ch...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8ab0d5cb-fb3c-4341-b2c0- 05bf76131c6c@q27g200
0prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
> The bass rendition must be marvellous.
>
> But it won't be. In headphones the waves are essentially inserted directly
> into the ear canals - dispersion and loss are minimal, and so the size of
> the transponder (speaker) is not very important.
>
> OTOH for a loudspeaker the wavelength is many times the size of the
> transponder for bass and the output suffers - this is why decent room
> speakers are large.
But for voice only podcasts, the sounds is fine.
peace out.
| |
| R. Mark Clayton 2008-04-01, 7:33 am |
|
<childish.chris@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:fd9c4543-128d-4997-beb6- fae395b2d347@a22g200
0hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 1, 10:18 am, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclay...@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> But for voice only podcasts, the sounds is fine.
It will be fine for voice.
>
> peace out.
| |
| Jolly Roger 2008-04-01, 12:33 pm |
| In article < T7GdnSkFW4w2kW_anZ2d
nUVZ8vqdnZ2d@bt.com>,
"R. Mark Clayton" < nospamclayton@btinte
rnet.com> wrote:
> <childish.chris@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:fd9c4543-128d-4997-beb6- fae395b2d347@a22g200
0hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> It will be fine for voice.
Well gee - thank you for giving the rest of us permission to use it that
way.
--
Please send all responses to the relevant news group. E-mail sent to
this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. I do not
read posts from Google Groups. Use a real news reader if you want me to
see your posts.
JR
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
| R. Mark Clayton 2008-04-01, 10:33 pm |
|
<London. Embankment@googlemai
l.com> wrote in message
news:e02d1db1-8860-45c5-83ee- 6fbb4e085ae7@b64g200
0hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 1, 11:21 am, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclay...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> <childish.ch...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fd9c4543-128d-4997-beb6- fae395b2d347@a22g200
0hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
So for the purposes of a voice podcast (rather than for dancing to on
a packed dance floor) the iPhone is fine. Which is what the OP said.
Well not quite, until after it was pointed out the sound would be hopeless
and tinny for music, unless I am missing something and podcasts aren't
normally music...
| |
| Howard Brazee 2008-04-02, 10:33 am |
| On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:55:22 -0700 (PDT), childish.chris@googlemail.com
wrote:
>
>I can't think on any music podcasts actually. All are voice. I
>thought peeps couldn't podcast music cos of copyright law and stuff
>like that (I'm not including crappy independent 'podsafe' music - I'm
>talking about real music that people pay actual money to go see)
>
>I subscribe to a bunch of podcasts. ALL are voice
NPR has some rock concert podcasts.
|
|
|
|
|